-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add FileSystem interface to LocalPackageWriter #4086
Add FileSystem interface to LocalPackageWriter #4086
Conversation
@campoy: This PR has multiple commits, and the default merge method is: merge. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hi @campoy. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
0c9304d
to
c513977
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one question, other than that lgtm
/lgtm
if err != nil { | ||
buf.Reset() | ||
w := ByteWriter{ | ||
Writer: buf, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rather than writing to a buffer and then to the fs, would it work to do r.FileSystem.Create(path)
and pass the result to the ByteWriter
here, more similarly to what was being done before?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason is that there's no easy way with the current filesystem abstraction to open a file with O_TRUNC
Can you please rebase when you have a chance? Github isn't flagging it, but the first commit has already merged via your other PR. |
…orrectly for Windows tests.
c513977
to
0fa0563
Compare
After rebasing, this requires a new LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: campoy, KnVerey The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Add a new FileSystem field in kio. LocalPackageWriter for better testing and adapt previous tests to run both using the real file system and an in-memory mock.
Updates #3873