-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
replace bash for loop when checking API server SANs #9060
replace bash for loop when checking API server SANs #9060
Conversation
Hi @rptaylor. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
b3d3b7f
to
0dc2c29
Compare
0dc2c29
to
a6455a9
Compare
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Hey @rptaylor, to me this looks way nicer. For a few seconds penalty I don't think it's a huge issue performance wise indeed... Could you rebase your PR and possibly fix the issue in the CI though? |
a6455a9
to
d3b4fea
Compare
fix merge conflict
91b53f8
to
78355d6
Compare
@MrFreezeex Thanks, I rebased and fixed the lint. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rptaylor With added though to my previous thinking, let's go and merge it.
Might be prettier (and so easier to maintain) in the long run
And you're right, if testing done the performance drop is that low, it doesn't matter that much.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, rptaylor The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
fix merge conflict
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
This is an updated rebased version of #8050, see discussion and motivation there.
Special notes for your reviewer:
It may take about one second longer to run by default (maybe several seconds if there are a lot of SANs?) but even for a small cluster Kubespray takes ~ 30 minutes to run so the effect is only ~ 0.1% - 1%, so the impact would not be significant or even perceptible.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: