scheduler: make error more clear when numa-aware

[ZiMengSheng]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

optimize NUMA Affinity Error, give which resource is unsatisfied

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

• I have written necessary docs and comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• All checks passed in make test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 74.48980% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 66.04%. Comparing base (a62dd49) to head (6eb0371).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../scheduler/frameworkext/topologymanager/manager.go	0.00%	21 Missing ⚠️
...g/scheduler/frameworkext/topologymanager/policy.go	94.44%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/scheduler/plugins/deviceshare/topology_hint.go	85.71%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2305      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.02%   66.04%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         458      458              
  Lines       53868    53921      +53     
==========================================
+ Hits        35564    35611      +47     
- Misses      15749    15756       +7     
+ Partials     2555     2554       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	66.04% <74.48%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[saintube]

/lgtm