Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

koord-manager: fix invalid assignments in the resource amplification … #2149

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2024

Conversation

yangfeiyu20102011
Copy link
Contributor

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

NodeResourceAmplificationPlugin func handleUpdate

In the else branch, the assignment to originalResources does not take effect in the subsequent process, which might be a typographical error.
It will print "admit for node-x, skip resource cpu as it is not found in original resources",
and resource will not be amplified.
This result is unexpected.

This PR fixes the issue and adds some useful information.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

  • I have written necessary docs and comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • All checks passed in make test

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot requested review from eahydra and FillZpp August 1, 2024 03:36
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.89%. Comparing base (7eaa33a) to head (f43a9b6).

Files Patch % Lines
...ns/resourceamplification/resource_amplification.go 50.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2149   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.89%   67.89%           
=======================================
  Files         443      443           
  Lines       41920    41921    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        28463    28464    +1     
+ Misses      11006    11004    -2     
- Partials     2451     2453    +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 67.89% <50.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@saintube saintube requested review from zqzten and zwzhang0107 August 1, 2024 08:39
@saintube
Copy link
Member

saintube commented Aug 1, 2024

PTAL /cc @zqzten

@zqzten
Copy link
Member

zqzten commented Aug 1, 2024

Yeah that's a bug I think. /cc @hormes can make a double check on that.

Also, this case is not covered in test now, it would be nice if you can also add a test for it to ensure the fix.

…webhook

Signed-off-by: yangfeiyu20102011 <yangfeiyu20102011@163.com>
@zqzten
Copy link
Member

zqzten commented Aug 1, 2024

/lgtm

@koordinator-bot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hormes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot merged commit b5b8abf into koordinator-sh:main Aug 5, 2024
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants