Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup Tendermint before merging into main #169

Merged

Conversation

joaomlneto
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

Biatbe13 and others added 30 commits November 4, 2024 21:52
…ing certificates in a different way. Comments added.
…ry fails on getting f+1 commit messages - it doesnt commit and reply.
…tive history and this will be used for a view change message. I still need to figure out how A2 condition is possible in a view change. New-view can be accepted now but I dont think its fully correct.
…lso how should primary handle Requests frowarded from replicas as timestamp is different, so it will treat them as new requests.
…replies at the Client as Client doesnt know the sequence number unless one reply is sent.
…that somehow. Also new-view doesnt work as supposed to.
…sts selected from R, however, I think the new-view should be entered first, then checkpoint and then the new primary ditributes the requests from R.
@joaomlneto joaomlneto requested a review from AFNowakowski March 3, 2025 14:23
@joaomlneto joaomlneto merged commit 944e5ce into tendermint-main-fix-byzzfuzz-partitions Mar 3, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants