Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(iota-framework): audit issues fix #4743

Merged

Conversation

valeriyr
Copy link
Contributor

Description of change

This PR contains all the audit fixes related to the following issues.

Links to any relevant issues

fixes #4592

fixes #4593
fixes #4595
fixes #4596

@valeriyr valeriyr self-assigned this Jan 10, 2025
@valeriyr valeriyr requested review from a team as code owners January 10, 2025 09:44
@iota-ci iota-ci added sc-platform Issues related to the Smart Contract Platform group. vm-language Issues related to the VM & Language Team labels Jan 10, 2025
@valeriyr valeriyr added vm-language Issues related to the VM & Language Team and removed vm-language Issues related to the VM & Language Team labels Jan 10, 2025
@valeriyr valeriyr force-pushed the sc-platform/issue-4592-audit-fixes branch from e097872 to a1a2cd7 Compare January 10, 2025 10:07
Copy link
Contributor

@miker83z miker83z left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ Response: {
"effects",
"objectChanges",
"nodes",
0,
2,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is that because of the bugfix?

"edges": []
}
},
"coins_before_obj_3_0_chkpt_3": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is it ok that the coins are now in "after checkpoint" and before they where in "before"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, they changed the order.

@valeriyr valeriyr requested a review from kodemartin January 13, 2025 09:21
@valeriyr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kodemartin Can you, please, approve the graphql tests change. The protocol version used in the tests was changed in the base branch to 3.

Copy link
Contributor

@kodemartin kodemartin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@valeriyr valeriyr merged commit 7979d57 into core-protocol/procotol-version-3 Jan 13, 2025
42 checks passed
@valeriyr valeriyr deleted the sc-platform/issue-4592-audit-fixes branch January 13, 2025 12:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sc-platform Issues related to the Smart Contract Platform group. vm-language Issues related to the VM & Language Team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants