Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial Functionality for SBML Simulation Implementation #753

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 26, 2025

Conversation

umut-er
Copy link
Contributor

@umut-er umut-er commented Jan 25, 2025

This PR implements the initial functionality needed to implement SBML simulation support for Newt. Here is a list of features that are implemented:

  • UI and data model changes required to input / store values needed for the SBML simulation.
  • Import / Export functionality for SBML simulation values
  • Functionality to calculate the simulation and display its values.

Below, you can find a demonstration of the simulation feature.

Screen.Recording.2025-01-25.at.14.43.43.mp4

There are several other SBML simulation features that are not added in this PR that would be very nice to have:

  • Support for local and global parameters, both import / export ( Very useful for testing also as the SBML test suite has parameters in nearly all cases.) and manually adding / removing them in the UI.
  • Support for units (mole, liter etc..), creating units from already existing ones using the UI, import / export for units.

Important things to consider:

  • This PR depends on two other PRs submitted to sbgnviz.js and chise.js.
  • I have been using my own forks of sbgnviz.js and chise.js for the development of this branch. You might want to change those in the package.json before any type of merge.

There are of course many more features for SBML simulations that can be added. Information about those can be found in the SBML specifications. There probably is enough content here for a future GSOC project 👍

@umut-er umut-er merged commit 34c2a0e into iVis-at-Bilkent:SBML_Simulation Jan 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant