Test evaluate_condition

[albertvillanova]

Test evaluate_condition.

[aymeric-roucher]

Thank you @albertvillanova !

[albertvillanova]

While implementing the tests, I discovered this code line in evaluate_condition:

smolagents/src/smolagents/local_python_executor.py

Line 759 in b20da6a

return result if isinstance(result, (bool, pd.Series)) else result.all()

• Why pd.Series is there?
• Why the call to .all()?

I don't understand these two.

CC: @aymeric-roucher

[aymeric-roucher]

@albertvillanova the specific handling of pd.Series is made to handle df selection in pandas with df.loc[df["column"] == 2]
In that case the equality test df["column"] == 2should not return a boolean but a pandas.Series of the result (like pd.Series([True, True, False, True, ...])).
The .all() is here to test that all comparators in the list are True.

[aymeric-roucher]

By the way testing pandas Series indexing would be a good regression test!

[albertvillanova]

@aymeric-roucher I am working on additional tests. But I need to understand the expected behavior.

However, I don't understand the .all case: list in Python does not have an .all method. Which object type is result in this case?Could you give me an example for this case, where we want to call the .all method?

[albertvillanova]

I'm merging this PR and opening another to fix evaluate_condition on non-boolean results.

[aymeric-roucher]

@albertvillanova I don't remember the precise case for which I originally added .all()! Thus feel free to remove it.

[albertvillanova]

Follow-up PR:

• Fix evaluate_condition for non-bool result #638