Support for rule level ChallgneConfig in wafv2_web_acl

[gdemarcsek]

Description

AWS WAFv2 ACL Rule supports ChallengeConfig however the AWS Terraform provider does not. This MR extends the provider with support for this attribute.

Relations

Relates #29071 (comment)
Relates #35367

References

• https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/APIReference/API_Rule.html
• https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/APIReference/API_ChallengeConfig.html
• https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/waf-tokens-immunity-times.html

Output from Acceptance Testing

% make testacc TESTS=TestAccWAFV2WebACL_Custom_requestHandling PKG=wafv2

...make: Verifying source code with gofmt...
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go1.23.3 test ./internal/service/wafv2/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run='TestAccWAFV2WebACL_Custom_requestHandling'  -timeout 360m
2024/11/23 21:36:13 Initializing Terraform AWS Provider...
=== RUN   TestAccWAFV2WebACL_Custom_requestHandling
=== PAUSE TestAccWAFV2WebACL_Custom_requestHandling
=== CONT  TestAccWAFV2WebACL_Custom_requestHandling
--- PASS: TestAccWAFV2WebACL_Custom_requestHandling (85.83s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/wafv2	92.543s

[github-actions]

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
• Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

• Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
• For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
• Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

[gdemarcsek]

Sorry, I just realized we happened to find this annoying at around the same time with @kcul, feel free to merge their PR instead: #40123

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.