-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Solving ad multifield #687
Conversation
…ifferent number of DoFs per field.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #687 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 87.93% 87.50% -0.44%
==========================================
Files 133 133
Lines 14966 15018 +52
==========================================
- Hits 13161 13142 -19
- Misses 1805 1876 +71 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
The general idea looks good to me. |
…ifferent number of DoFs per field.
…nto solving_ad_multifield
@fverdugo ... this PR is ready for review. AD for Multifield Residuals is back again! 😎 😎 😎 The review should focus IMO on providing solutions to the items listed in the PR description. |
Hi @amartinhuertas and @fverdugo ! Thanks for fixing this issue :). I was wondering if you also planned to add the MultiField |
Related to issue #584
Hi @fverdugo,
find attached a first approach to solve the issue related to the
gradient
of a FE functional evaluated at a multifield FE function with different number of DoFs per field. Once we are happy with the current solution forgradient
, I will extend this solution tojacobian
. Agreed?