Improve CI (Aarch64, Power) #285
Conversation
| local -r GCC_PREFIX="powerpc64" | ||
| ;; | ||
| "ppc") | ||
| #local -r POWER_URL="https://toolchains.bootlin.com/downloads/releases/toolchains/powerpc-e500mc/tarballs/powerpc-e500mc--glibc--stable-2021.11-1.tar.bz2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is it commented out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While QEmu provide a single ppc target (as well as docker), bootlin provide several flavors
440fp and e500mc for PowerPC while here I arbitrarily the 440fp we could have choose the other one...
An other way would be to have ppc-e500mc and ppc-440fp (and ppc alias of ppc-440fp ?)
ref:
docker run --rm --privileged multiarch/qemu-user-static --reset -p yes
...
Setting /usr/bin/qemu-ppc-static as binfmt interpreter for ppc
Setting /usr/bin/qemu-ppc64-static as binfmt interpreter for ppc64
Setting /usr/bin/qemu-ppc64le-static as binfmt interpreter for ppc64lenote: same issue with ppc64[le]: power8, e5500, 'e6500', le-power8...
| @@ -230,12 +253,14 @@ function expand_codescape_config() { | |||
| "mips64") | |||
| MIPS_FLAGS="-EB -mips64r6 -mabi=64" | |||
| FLAVOUR="mips-r6-hard" | |||
| #MIPS_FLAGS="-EB -mips64r2 -mabi=64" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
same here and below, why do you need to keep these comments?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
same here maybe we could have a flag to decide which version to use so user can easily reuse this script to target the correct CPU by just changing one line, so while we only enable one flavor it's easy for the community to adapt.
Or again we should/could have both mips-r6/mips-r2 and a mips alias to target the last one aka mips-r6 ?
Few updates