Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bugfix for moab scheduler job dependency format #74

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2016

Conversation

dyndna
Copy link
Contributor

@dyndna dyndna commented Oct 1, 2016

  • bugfix in render-dependency.R script
    • corrected moab dependency function, render_dependency.moab to correctly format dependency arguments in MSUB script, e.g., #MSUB -l depend=afterok:960775:960854 instead of #MSUB -l depend=afterok:960775: depend=afterok:960854. Tested OK on HPC running moab scheduler
    • similar fix for sge scheduler too but untested.on HPC running sge scheduler

* bugfix in `render-dependency.R` script
    * corrected `moab` dependency function, *render_dependency.moab* to correctly format dependency arguments in MSUB script, e.g., `#MSUB -l depend=afterok:960775:960854` instead of `#MSUB -l  depend=afterok:960775: depend=afterok:960854`. Tested OK on HPC running moab scheduler
    * similar fix for sge scheduler too but untested.on HPC running sge scheduler
@sbamin
Copy link
Contributor

sbamin commented Feb 18, 2017

Do we know why these bugfix was reversed? #MSUB -l depend=afterok:960775:960854 works for scatter-gather but not the current format, #MSUB -l depend=afterok:960775: depend=afterok:960854

sahilseth added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2017
#MSUB -l depend=afterok:960775:960854 works for scatter-gather but not the current format, #MSUB -l depend=afterok:960775: depend=afterok:960854
sahilseth added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2017
@sahilseth
Copy link
Collaborator

I think the pull request was made on master branch and this crept back in while I was merging a few pull requests. If you could, submit changes in devel branch. Test tonight?

@sbamin
Copy link
Contributor

sbamin commented Feb 19, 2017

I think you just reverted it back. addfe29

I can test later this week as I had to install v 0.9.10.9017 from edaacfa That is working without an issue.

sahilseth added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2017
@sahilseth
Copy link
Collaborator

hey @dyndna, this version from master branch should be current (and with the fix).
Version: 0.9.10.9021

@sbamin
Copy link
Contributor

sbamin commented Feb 23, 2017

got it and will run today

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants