Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[compiler] First cut at dep inference #31386
[compiler] First cut at dep inference #31386
Changes from 7 commits
469ae32
3bd6f87
5d7cc78
72b6f1b
0481ddd
cedc4b6
d99e393
d77ad3d
9b6d39f
bd14dde
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could you add a ref here and a non-primitive local too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks a little weird to me-- the reactive deps of the function on 93 are more precise than the deps we insert here, but we filter the effect deps to just its reactive deps...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mofeiZ: I think you were working on a related problem here about capturing member expressions- does anything look strange to you here? Should I be filtering the deps differently?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Chatted about this offline, the correct fix here was to change effect dependencies to be derived from
ReactiveScope.dependencies
instead ofLoweredFunction.dependencies
(also see #31386 (comment))