Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature flag: Use custom requestIdleCallback even when native one exists #12385

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2018

Conversation

acdlite
Copy link
Collaborator

@acdlite acdlite commented Mar 16, 2018

We'll use this in www to test whether the polyfill is better at scheduling high-pri async work than the native one. My preliminary tests suggest "yes" but it's hard to say for certain, given how difficult it is to consistently reproduce the starvation issues we've been seeing.

We'll use this in www to test whether the polyfill is better at
scheduling high-pri async work than the native one. My preliminary tests
suggest "yes" but it's hard to say for certain, given how difficult it
is to consistently reproduce the starvation issues we've been seeing.
@acdlite acdlite merged commit 7e87df8 into facebook:master Mar 16, 2018
LeonYuAng3NT pushed a commit to LeonYuAng3NT/react that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2018
…sts (facebook#12385)

We'll use this in www to test whether the polyfill is better at
scheduling high-pri async work than the native one. My preliminary tests
suggest "yes" but it's hard to say for certain, given how difficult it
is to consistently reproduce the starvation issues we've been seeing.
rhagigi pushed a commit to rhagigi/react that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2018
…sts (facebook#12385)

We'll use this in www to test whether the polyfill is better at
scheduling high-pri async work than the native one. My preliminary tests
suggest "yes" but it's hard to say for certain, given how difficult it
is to consistently reproduce the starvation issues we've been seeing.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants