Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve confusing phrasing #402

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

emlun
Copy link
Contributor

@emlun emlun commented Feb 12, 2025

I find this phrasing ("Under no circumstances User approval [...]") confusing. It initially seems like a misprint with one sentence suddenly interrupted by the other, which then becomes "User approval to present data from their Wallet Unit should be construed as lawful grounds [...]" which appears to be the opposite of the intended meaning.

I find this phrasing ("Under no circumstances User approval [...]") confusing.
It initially seems like a misprint with one sentence suddenly interrupted by the
other, which then becomes "User approval to present data from their Wallet Unit
should be construed as lawful grounds [...]" which appears to be the opposite of
the intended meaning.
@@ -2685,7 +2685,7 @@ will be further discussed with Member States for ARF 2.0.

**Note: In this document the term 'User approval' exclusively refers to a User's
*decision to present an attribute to a Relying Party. Under no circumstances
*User approval to present data from their Wallet Unit should be construed as
*should User approval to present data from their Wallet Unit be construed as
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The existing phrase is grammatically incorrect. The suggestion does indeed fix it.

@paolo-de-rosa paolo-de-rosa merged commit e698780 into eu-digital-identity-wallet:main Feb 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants