Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
core/rawdb: simple legacy receipt converter #24028
core/rawdb: simple legacy receipt converter #24028
Changes from 6 commits
fe98df1
3d7ec7e
52612e6
0b14470
e08d82f
8e4b429
c503ec0
94e7e93
561c180
8a63c99
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any specific reason for rejecting this type of table? It's ok to keep this checking but would be nice to get rid of it eventually.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added this quick check to make sure the table hasn't been tail-trimmed. Because the migration process will not fully work for such a table right now and need some tweaks. I'll add a todo comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One thing to be aware of, which I find pretty counter-intuitive, is that
f.Name()
doesn't return the canonical filename, but "the name of the file as presented to Open".prints out
So it looks to me like this shouldn't work, but I haven't tested it, maybe it does?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is counter-intuitive...however in this case it works because
ioutil.ReadDir
returns a list offs.FileInfo
which is a bit different thanos.File
struct.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, maybe add some comments about the file name? So that next time we won't be confused.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The behavior of
Os.Rename
depends on the operator system. We may need to handle at least windows explicitly.For example,
go-leveldb
uses this code for windowshttps://github.com/syndtr/goleveldb/blob/master/leveldb/storage/file_storage_windows.go#L66
But I never test it :P