Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: include invalid results for pump models #792

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

olelod
Copy link
Contributor

@olelod olelod commented Feb 19, 2025

Replaces #431

Why is this pull request needed?

The lower-level results currently differ between ‘compressors’ and ‘pumps’. For compressors the results for calculations with invalid points are included, but not for pumps.

What does this pull request change?

Invalid results are returned (with a failure status flag) for pump models also

@olelod olelod marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 09:51
@olelod olelod requested a review from a team as a code owner February 20, 2025 09:51
frodehk and others added 11 commits February 26, 2025 08:54
# Please enter the commit message for your changes. Lines starting
# with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts the commit.
#
# interactive rebase in progress; onto 0879cec
# Last commands done (3 commands done):
#    pick 5193678 test: update snapshots and tests
#    pick 4529b32 chore: update snapshots to work with periods
# Next commands to do (7 remaining commands):
#    pick 3910cd4 chore: include invalid data in pump model plot
#    pick 4811a8e chore: update tests
# You are currently rebasing branch 'ECALC-799' on '0879cecc'.
#
# Changes to be committed:
#	modified:   src/libecalc/domain/process/core/results/pump.py
#	modified:   src/libecalc/domain/process/pump/pump.py
#	modified:   tests/libecalc/core/consumers/system/conftest.py
#
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants