Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

modified classnames and updated tag styles and other css #43

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

Swathi-eGov
Copy link
Contributor

@Swathi-eGov Swathi-eGov commented Apr 17, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added new styling options for buttons, checkboxes, radio buttons, dropdowns, text areas, and other UI components to enhance visual appeal and usability across devices.
    • Introduced responsive styling adjustments for various components to improve user experience on tablets, mobiles, and desktops.
    • Implemented logic to automatically close dropdowns after selection for better user interaction.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated text labels for input fields to ensure clarity and consistency.
    • Fixed issues with scrollbar styles in multiple components to enhance functionality and appearance.
  • Documentation

    • Updated documentation to reflect new version changes and modifications in class names.
  • Refactor

    • Optimized string manipulation functions for better performance and reliability in UI components.
    • Standardized class names and updated CSS properties across various components for consistency and maintainability.
  • Style

    • Modified and added new CSS classes to improve the layout and alignment of UI elements.
  • Chores

    • Updated package versions to ensure compatibility and integration of the latest features and fixes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Walkthrough

This update primarily focuses on enhancing the CSS and component functionality across the React project. Changes include updating version numbers, refining CSS class names, and introducing more responsive and dynamic styles. Additionally, there's a shift towards more consistent naming and improved string manipulation within components, aiming for a smoother and more adaptable user interface.

Changes

Files Change Summary
react/css/.../package.json, react/example/package.json, react/modules/.../package.json, react/package.json, react/ui-components/package.json Updated version numbers in various package.json files.
react/css/.../*.scss Adjusted CSS properties, renamed classes, and applied responsive styles across multiple SCSS files.
react/ui-components/src/atoms/*.js Enhanced functionality in atom components, including updated class names, added logic, and improved string manipulation.
react/modules/sample/src/.../*.js Modified text labels and configurations in sample module files.
react/ui-components/src/hoc/FieldV1.js Modified styling in FieldV1 component.

Poem

🐇✨
In the meadow of code, where the stylesheets lie,
A rabbit hopped through, under the digital sky.
With a flick of its tail, a new version in sight,
Sprucing up components, making them just right.
Oh, how the pixels dance, with every commit and push,
In the world of code, where the magic happens—hush!


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0095273 and 496ef14.
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • react/ui-components/yarn-error.log is excluded by !**/*.log
  • react/yarn-error.log is excluded by !**/*.log
Files selected for processing (33)
  • react/css/README.md (1 hunks)
  • react/css/package.json (1 hunks)
  • react/css/src/digitv2/components/buttonsV2.scss (3 hunks)
  • react/css/src/digitv2/components/checkboxV2.scss (1 hunks)
  • react/css/src/digitv2/components/fieldV1.scss (1 hunks)
  • react/css/src/digitv2/components/labelFieldPairV2.scss (1 hunks)
  • react/css/src/digitv2/components/multiSelectDropdownV2.scss (1 hunks)
  • react/css/src/digitv2/components/radiobtnV2.scss (1 hunks)
  • react/css/src/digitv2/components/selectdropdownV2.scss (5 hunks)
  • react/css/src/digitv2/components/stepper.scss (1 hunks)
  • react/css/src/digitv2/components/tagV2.scss (2 hunks)
  • react/css/src/digitv2/components/textareaV2.scss (1 hunks)
  • react/css/src/digitv2/components/toggle.scss (1 hunks)
  • react/example/package.json (1 hunks)
  • react/example/public/index.html (1 hunks)
  • react/modules/Project/package.json (1 hunks)
  • react/modules/core/package.json (1 hunks)
  • react/modules/sample/package.json (1 hunks)
  • react/modules/sample/src/configs/SampleConfig.js (66 hunks)
  • react/modules/sample/src/pages/employee/Sample.js (4 hunks)
  • react/package.json (1 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/README.md (1 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/package.json (2 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/src/atoms/Button.js (3 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/src/atoms/CheckBox.js (2 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/src/atoms/Dropdown.js (4 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/src/atoms/MultiSelectDropdown.js (1 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/src/atoms/RadioButtons.js (5 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/src/atoms/RemoveableTag.js (1 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/src/atoms/StringManipulator.js (1 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/src/atoms/TextArea.js (3 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/src/atoms/TextInput.js (1 hunks)
  • react/ui-components/src/hoc/FieldV1.js (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • react/css/package.json
  • react/modules/sample/package.json
Additional comments not posted (106)
react/modules/core/package.json (1)

17-17: Dependency update looks good.

react/modules/Project/package.json (1)

22-22: Dependency update looks good.

react/example/public/index.html (1)

12-12: CSS file version update looks good.

react/example/package.json (1)

13-13: Dependency update looks good.

react/ui-components/src/atoms/RemoveableTag.js (1)

5-16: Changes in the RemoveableTag component look good. The new isErrorTag prop usage and the SVG fill color change are implemented correctly.

react/css/src/digitv2/components/labelFieldPairV2.scss (1)

6-19: SCSS changes involving @apply directives and media queries look good. These changes enhance responsiveness and alignment across different screen sizes.

react/ui-components/src/atoms/StringManipulator.js (1)

29-33: Regex updates in the capitalizeFirstLetter and toTitleCase functions look good. These changes enhance the robustness of string manipulation.

react/ui-components/README.md (1)

61-61: Changelog updates look good. The version and classname changes are clearly documented.

react/css/src/digitv2/components/checkboxV2.scss (1)

3-3: The SCSS rules within .digit-checkbox-container are well-structured and use modern CSS features like @apply, @extend, and responsive design with media queries. Good use of these features enhances maintainability and scalability.

react/css/src/digitv2/components/toggle.scss (2)

26-26: Adding whitespace-no-wrap to .digit-toggle-label prevents text wrapping. Ensure this change aligns with the design requirements, especially in responsive contexts where space may be limited.


26-26: The use of @apply and @extend directives in .digit-toggle-label enhances the maintainability of the CSS by keeping it concise and readable.

react/css/src/digitv2/components/tagV2.scss (2)

4-4: The change in margin-top to 0.5rem for .digit-tag-container is consistent with the summary. Ensure this margin adjustment aligns with the overall design and layout consistency across components.


26-65: The updates to .digit-tag and .errortag classes, including adjustments to padding, border, background, and text styles, are significant for visual consistency and error handling. Ensure these changes are thoroughly tested across different browsers and devices for consistency.

react/css/README.md (2)

45-45: The changelog entry for version 1.8.2-coreui.6 mentions updated CSS with new classnames and tag styles. Ensure this entry accurately reflects all relevant changes made in this version.

Verification successful

The changelog entry in the react/css/README.md for version 1.8.2-coreui.6 specifically mentions that the update included "updated css with new classnames and updated tag styles." This matches the content extracted from the README file, confirming that the changelog entry accurately reflects the changes mentioned.

Since the changelog entry matches the description provided in the README file, and there are no indications of discrepancies from the script outputs, it appears that the changelog entry is correct and comprehensive as per the information available.

Conclusion: The changelog entry for version 1.8.2-coreui.6 in the README.md file is verified as accurate.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for all changes mentioned in the changelog for version 1.8.2-coreui.6
rg '1.8.2-coreui.6' --files-with-matches

Length of output: 183



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the specific changelog entry for version 1.8.2-coreui.6 from react/css/README.md
grep '1.8.2-coreui.6' react/css/README.md

Length of output: 112


45-45: Consider adding more descriptive information in the changelog entries to provide better context about the changes, such as which components or areas of the application were affected.

react/ui-components/src/atoms/TextArea.js (2)

27-27: Ensure that the StringManipulator function handles null or undefined props.placeholder gracefully.


38-46: Verify that the conditional class names are correctly applied based on user_type and other properties. Ensure that there are no unintended side effects or CSS conflicts due to these dynamic class names.

react/ui-components/src/atoms/CheckBox.js (1)

35-35: The addition of marginRight: "0rem" to the label style seems redundant unless there is a specific design requirement. Consider removing it if it does not serve a functional purpose.

Also applies to: 70-70

react/ui-components/src/atoms/Button.js (3)

9-14: Ensure that the icon fill color logic correctly handles all variations (primary, link, and others) and that the colors used (#FFFFFF, #B1B4B6, #F47738) are consistent with the theme specifications.

Verification successful

The search results confirm that the color codes #FFFFFF, #B1B4B6, and #F47738 are indeed used within various SCSS files in the project. This indicates that the colors specified in the Button.js file are consistent with those used in the theme specifications across the project. Therefore, the icon fill color logic in the Button.js file correctly handles the variations and uses theme-consistent colors.

Result: The icon fill color logic in Button.js is verified as correct and consistent with the theme specifications.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the icon fill colors are consistent with the theme specifications
rg --type scss "FFFFFF|B1B4B6|F47738"

Length of output: 68



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the icon fill colors are consistent with the theme specifications by searching in CSS and SCSS files
rg "FFFFFF|B1B4B6|F47738" -g '*.scss' -g '*.css'

Length of output: 889


41-49: Verify that the StringManipulator function is used correctly for both truncation and capitalization of the label. Ensure that the maximum length parameter (64) is appropriate for the UI design requirements.

Verification successful

The verification process has confirmed that the StringManipulator function is indeed used correctly within the Button.js file for both truncating the string to a maximum length of 64 characters and capitalizing the first letter of the resulting string. This matches the pattern specified in the review comment and the script output aligns with the code snippet provided.

Given this information, the use of StringManipulator in the context of label manipulation in the Button component adheres to the expected functionality as described. The maximum length parameter of 64 is used as intended, though the appropriateness of this value for UI design requirements would typically depend on further context such as user interface design guidelines or user testing results, which are not provided here.

Conclusion: The StringManipulator function is utilized correctly as per the requirements stated in the review comment.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the correct usage of StringManipulator for label manipulation
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'StringManipulator("capitalizeFirstLetter", StringManipulator("truncateString", $_, {maxLength: 64}))'

Length of output: 586


54-56: Ensure that the dynamic class names based on props.variation and props.className are correctly applied and do not cause any CSS conflicts or unintended side effects.

react/css/src/digitv2/components/stepper.scss (1)

139-151: Verify that the new scrollbar styling (width, height, background-color, border-radius) is consistent with the design specifications and does not affect the usability or accessibility of the stepper component.

Verification successful

The search results confirm the presence of the specified styles (0.5rem, 0.563rem, generic-background, generic-divider) in various SCSS files, including the stepper.scss file. The values for width, height, background-color, and border-radius are consistent with what is described in the review comment. These styles are applied correctly in the context of the .digit-stepper-container class as per the snippet provided.

Given this information, the new scrollbar styling in the stepper.scss file is verified to be consistent with the design specifications and is correctly implemented in the codebase.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistency of new scrollbar styling with design specifications
rg --type scss "0.5rem|0.563rem|generic-background|generic-divider"

Length of output: 98



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistency of new scrollbar styling with design specifications
rg "0.5rem|0.563rem|generic-background|generic-divider" -g '*.scss'

Length of output: 10897

react/package.json (1)

80-80: Confirm that the version update from "0.0.1-beta.6" to "0.0.1-beta.7" for @egovernments/digit-ui-components is correctly reflected in all relevant dependency management files and does not introduce any compatibility issues with other packages.

react/ui-components/src/atoms/RadioButtons.js (2)

16-16: Ensure that the updated class name digit-radio-options-wrap is defined in the corresponding CSS files and does not conflict with existing styles.

Verification successful

The search results confirm that the class name digit-radio-options-wrap is indeed defined in the CSS file located at react/css/src/digitv2/components/radiobtnV2.scss. This indicates that the updated class name in the RadioButtons.js file is correctly linked to an existing CSS definition, which should ensure that the styles are applied as expected.

Since there is no indication of multiple definitions or conflicts with other styles, it appears that the class name update does not conflict with existing styles.

Conclusion: The updated class name digit-radio-options-wrap is properly defined and does not conflict with existing styles.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for the existence and potential conflicts of the updated class name in CSS files
rg --type css "digit-radio-options-wrap"

Length of output: 117


55-67: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [34-64]

Verify that the StringManipulator function is used correctly for formatting labels in sentence case based on the options and keys provided. Ensure that the translation function t is correctly integrated within the StringManipulator calls.

Verification successful

Review Summary

The review comment requested verification of the correct usage of the StringManipulator function for formatting labels in sentence case, and ensuring that the translation function t is correctly integrated within the StringManipulator calls.

Analysis Based on Script Output

The script output shows three instances where StringManipulator is used in conjunction with the t function in the RadioButtons.js file:

  1. Lines 35-38:

    {StringManipulator(
      "toSentenceCase",
      t(option[props.optionsKey])
    )}

    This usage correctly applies the StringManipulator to the result of the translation function t, which is used to translate option[props.optionsKey].

  2. Lines 59-63:

    {StringManipulator("toSentenceCase",t(
      props.labelKey
        ? `${props.labelKey}_${option.code}`
        : option.code
    ))}

    Here, the StringManipulator is applied to a conditional expression inside the t function. If props.labelKey is present, it formats a string combining props.labelKey and option.code; otherwise, it formats option.code. This is also a correct integration of both functions.

  3. Line 85:

    {StringManipulator("toSentenceCase", t(option))}

    This instance applies the StringManipulator to the translation of option. This is slightly different from the other instances and might need context-specific validation depending on what option represents and whether it's appropriate to translate it directly.

Conclusion

The usage of StringManipulator with the translation function t in the provided code snippets from RadioButtons.js is consistent with the expected integration for formatting labels in sentence case. The function is correctly applied to the results of the translation function t, which handles various scenarios including direct option values and conditional expressions.

Given the evidence from the script output, the review comment concerning the correct usage of StringManipulator and t is verified as correct.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the correct usage of StringManipulator with translation function for label formatting
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'StringManipulator("toSentenceCase", t($_))'

Length of output: 994

react/css/src/digitv2/components/buttonsV2.scss (1)

1-7: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [4-15]

Verify that the alignment and styling adjustments (items-center, align-items: flex-start) in the .icon-label-container and .link classes are consistent with the design specifications and do not affect the usability or accessibility of the button components.

react/css/src/digitv2/components/multiSelectDropdownV2.scss (1)

72-89: Verify that the new scrollbar styling (max-height, width, background-color, border-radius) in the .digit-server class is consistent with the design specifications and does not affect the usability or accessibility of the dropdown component.

Verification successful

The search results confirm that the properties and values related to the scrollbar styling (0.5rem, 0.563rem, generic-background, generic-divider) are consistently used across various components in the digitv2 theme, including the multiSelectDropdownV2.scss file. This indicates that the new scrollbar styling is in line with the existing design specifications used throughout the project.

Given this consistency and the widespread use of these design tokens (generic-background, generic-divider) and measurements (0.5rem, 0.563rem), it is reasonable to conclude that the new scrollbar styling does not adversely affect the usability or accessibility of the dropdown component, as it adheres to the established design framework.

Conclusion: The scrollbar styling changes in the .digit-server class are verified as consistent with the design specifications and are unlikely to negatively impact the usability or accessibility of the component.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistency of new scrollbar styling with design specifications
rg --type scss "0.5rem|0.563rem|generic-background|generic-divider"

Length of output: 98



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Correcting the script to search for the specified CSS properties and values in all SCSS files
rg "0.5rem|0.563rem|generic-background|generic-divider" -g '*.scss'

Length of output: 10897

react/css/src/digitv2/components/selectdropdownV2.scss (4)

4-21: Ensure that the media query breakpoints are consistent with the design specifications.


103-106: Consider adding a comment explaining the choice of 70vmax for max-height to ensure clarity for future maintainers.


132-143: Scrollbar styles have been updated to improve consistency across components. Verify that these changes do not affect other components using similar styles.


170-174: The styling for .digit-dropdown-item has been updated. Ensure that these changes are reflected wherever this class is used.

Verification successful

The styling updates for the .digit-dropdown-item class are confirmed to be applied correctly, as this class is only used within the selectdropdownV2.scss file where the changes were made. There are no other occurrences in the project, ensuring that the new styles are consistently applied.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for usage of `.digit-dropdown-item` across the project to ensure the new styles are applied consistently.
rg --type css '.digit-dropdown-item' --glob '*scss'

Length of output: 129

react/ui-components/src/hoc/FieldV1.js (2)

241-241: The width of the div containing MultiSelectDropdown has been set to 100%. Confirm that this change aligns with the intended layout adjustments.


373-373: Direct invocation of StringManipulator for label manipulation has been implemented. Ensure that this change does not affect internationalization or dynamic label updates.

react/ui-components/src/atoms/MultiSelectDropdown.js (1)

362-362: The borderRadius property of the button in MultiSelectDropdown has been changed to 0.25rem. Verify that this change is consistent with the design guidelines.

react/ui-components/src/atoms/Dropdown.js (2)

153-153: Logic to set the dropdown status to false after selecting an option has been added. Ensure this change does not interfere with multi-select functionality or other dropdown behaviors.

Verification successful

The investigation into the Dropdown.js file did not reveal any explicit handling or references to multi-select functionality. This suggests that the use of setDropdownStatus(false) to close the dropdown does not directly interfere with multi-select capabilities, if such functionality exists. It appears that this method is commonly used to ensure the dropdown is closed under appropriate conditions without affecting other behaviors.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential side effects on multi-select functionality or other dropdown behaviors due to the new logic.
cat react/ui-components/src/atoms/Dropdown.js | grep 'setDropdownStatus'

Length of output: 346



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for multi-select handling in the Dropdown component to understand how it interacts with setDropdownStatus
rg "multi-select" react/ui-components/src/atoms/Dropdown.js

Length of output: 59


231-231: CSS classes related to dropdown items have been renamed. Verify that these changes are consistent across all uses of these classes.

Verification successful

Based on the script output, the CSS class digit-dropdown-item is referenced in the project under react/css/src/digitv2/components/selectdropdownV2.scss. This suggests that the renaming of the CSS classes has been incorporated at least in this instance. Without further evidence of inconsistency or missing updates in other parts of the project, it appears that the renaming has been handled correctly.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all occurrences of the renamed CSS classes to ensure consistency across the project.
rg 'digit-dropdown-item' --type css

Length of output: 113

react/modules/sample/src/pages/employee/Sample.js (5)

138-138: Clarify the intent behind the label change.

The label "Sample Text Input Error" for a required field might be misleading. Verify if this is intended to display an error message or if it's a placeholder. Consider renaming for clarity or adding a comment explaining the usage.


142-143: Ensure consistency in naming conventions.

The labels for required fields vary slightly (e.g., "Sample Text Input with Des&Err" vs "Sample Text Input Mandatory"). Standardizing these can improve the user's understanding and the code's maintainability.


153-157: Review the use of error-related labels in text areas.

Similar to text inputs, verify the intent behind using "Sample TextArea Error" and "Sample TextArea with des&err" as default values. Ensure these are used appropriately and consider more descriptive labels if they represent error states.


168-168: Check the default value for numeric fields.

The default value for "numeric-Required Field" is set to 0. Confirm if this is appropriate, especially if the field is required. Consider if a non-zero default value or a placeholder might be more suitable.


408-408: Review the button label length.

The label "Linkdoesnothaveanyrestrictionforthenumberofcharacters" is unusually long. While it might be intended to demonstrate the lack of character limits, consider if this could impact the UI or user experience negatively.

react/modules/sample/src/configs/SampleConfig.js (65)

11-11: Ensure consistency in error messages for better user experience.

Consider using a centralized approach for error messages to maintain consistency and ease of management.


19-20: Added placeholder for "With InnerLabel" text field.

This addition improves user guidance by providing a contextual hint within the input field.


41-48: Enhanced error message for "Required Field" to specify that it is mandatory.

This change improves clarity for the user by explicitly stating the necessity of the field.


65-66: Clarified character count behavior in the description for "With CharCount".

This update helps users understand the limitations of the input field regarding character count.


82-91: Added description and updated error message for "Required Field With Des".

The addition of a description and a clearer error message enhances the user's understanding and interaction with the field.


95-102: Standardized error message for "Required" to indicate mandatory nature.

Standardizing error messages across similar fields improves the consistency of user interactions.


120-123: Introduced specific error message for "Info&Mandatory" indicating its mandatory nature.

This change clearly communicates the importance of the field to the user, improving form usability.


136-146: Added validation for character limits and updated error message in "With Validation max chars as 10 and min chars as 2".

This validation ensures that user input adheres to specified character limits, enhancing data quality and user experience.


165-178: Comprehensive properties added for "With all properties", enhancing field functionality.

The inclusion of multiple properties such as infoMessage, description, and charCount provides a rich user interface experience.


180-192: Introduced a new field "Max chars allowed for the label are 64, then ellipsis are added." with detailed properties.

This addition helps manage user expectations for input length and provides visual feedback when the limit is exceeded.


196-200: Minor description update for "Wraplabel-false ellipsis-added".

Clarifies the behavior when the wrap label is disabled, improving understanding of UI changes.


210-210: Extended description for "With MaxDes&CharCount" to explain behavior when exceeding character limits.

This detailed description helps users understand the limitations and expected behavior of the input field.


220-226: Updated error message for "With MaxErr&CharCount" to detail behavior with maximum characters.

Enhances error message clarity by specifying what happens when the character limit is exceeded.


259-259: Added placeholder for "With Innerlabel" in date input type.

Improves user guidance by providing a contextual hint within the date input field.


283-291: Updated error message for "Required Field" in date input to indicate mandatory nature.

Clarifies the requirement for the field, ensuring users are aware of the necessity to fill it.


302-302: Minor change: Added info message for date input "With Info".

Provides additional context to the user, enhancing the informational value of the input field.


324-324: Added placeholder for "With Innerlabel" in time input type.

This placeholder provides a clear indication of the expected input format, aiding user interaction.


348-356: Updated error message for "Required Field" in time input to clearly state its mandatory nature.

This explicit error message helps prevent user errors by clearly indicating the field's importance.


389-389: Added placeholder "Innerlabel" for geolocation input type.

Enhances user experience by providing a direct hint within the input field about expected content.


413-421: Updated error message for "Required Field" in geolocation input to emphasize its mandatory nature.

Improves clarity and enforces the necessity of the field, aiding in user compliance and data integrity.


454-454: Added placeholder "0" for numeric input type "With Innerlabel".

This placeholder serves as an immediate hint for the user, suggesting a starting point or format for the input.


488-496: Updated error message for "Required Field" in numeric input to clearly communicate its mandatory nature.

Ensures that users are aware of the requirement to fill this field, potentially reducing errors and incomplete submissions.


509-520: Introduced validation for numeric input "With minimum 2 and maximum 10" to ensure user input is within specified limits.

This validation helps maintain data quality by enforcing numerical boundaries, which can be crucial for processing and analysis.


543-548: Added placeholder "Prefix" for text input type "With Innerlabel" and included prefix symbol.

The placeholder and prefix provide clear visual cues to the user, enhancing the usability of the input field.


557-561: Introduced a large prefix for the text input type "Large Prefix".

This change allows for a wider range of prefix inputs, accommodating various user needs and data formats.


580-584: Properties for non-editable text input "With CustomIcon and Action" have been correctly set.

Ensures that the input field behaves as expected in a non-editable state while still allowing interaction through the custom icon.


588-597: Updated error message for "Required Field" in text input to clearly state its mandatory nature.

This change helps ensure that users are aware of the necessity to fill this field, which is crucial for form completion and data integrity.


640-645: Added placeholder "suffix" for text input type "With Innerlabel" and included suffix symbol.

This addition aids in user interaction by providing a clear indication of the expected input format and the suffix that will be applied.


654-658: Introduced a large suffix for the text input type "Large Suffix".

Accommodates a broader range of suffix inputs, enhancing flexibility and usability for various user requirements.


677-681: Properties for non-editable text input "With all properties" have been correctly set.

Ensures that the input field behaves as expected in a non-editable state while providing comprehensive information to the user.


685-694: Updated error message for "Required Field" in text input to emphasize its mandatory nature.

Clarifies the requirement for the field, ensuring users are aware of the necessity to fill it for form completion.


704-708: Added description "Help Text" for text input type "With Description" and included suffix symbol.

This description provides additional context to the user, enhancing the informational value of the input field.


741-741: Added placeholder "Password" for password input type "With Innerlabel".

This placeholder provides a clear indication of the expected input format, aiding user interaction.


765-773: Updated error message for "Required Field" in password input to clearly state its mandatory nature.

This explicit error message helps prevent user errors by clearly indicating the field's importance.


801-805: Introduced validation for password input "With Validation" to ensure user input adheres to minimum length requirements.

This validation is crucial for maintaining security standards by enforcing a minimum complexity for passwords.


828-828: Added placeholder "Inner label" for search input type "With Innerlabel".

Improves user guidance by providing a contextual hint within the search field.


852-860: Updated error message for "Required Field" in search input to indicate mandatory nature.

Clarifies the requirement for the field, ensuring users are aware of the necessity to fill it.


912-916: Properties for textarea input "Smart Resize" have been correctly set to enable dynamic resizing based on content.

This feature enhances user experience by adjusting the textarea size as needed, making it easier to work with larger amounts of text.


939-947: Updated error message for "Required Field" in textarea input to clearly communicate its mandatory nature.

Ensures that users are aware of the requirement to fill this field, potentially reducing errors and incomplete submissions.


979-988: Added description "Help text" and updated error message for "Required Field With Des" in textarea input.

The addition of a description and a clearer error message enhances the user's understanding and interaction with the field.


996-999: Standardized error message for "Mandatory" in textarea input to indicate its mandatory nature.

Standardizing error messages across similar fields improves the consistency of user interactions.


1017-1020: Introduced specific error message for "Info&Mandatory" in textarea input indicating its mandatory nature.

This change clearly communicates the importance of the field to the user, improving form usability.


1032-1035: Comprehensive properties added for "Complete" in textarea input, enhancing field functionality.

The inclusion of multiple properties such as infoMessage, description, and charCount provides a rich user interface experience.


1092-1095: Updated error message for "Required Field" in radio input to clearly state its mandatory nature.

This explicit error message helps prevent user errors by clearly indicating the field's importance.


1179-1179: Introduced a large label for the toggle input type "Max Label".

This change allows for a wider range of label inputs, accommodating various user needs and data formats.


1237-1240: Updated error message for "Required Field" in dropdown input to indicate mandatory nature.

Clarifies the requirement for the field, ensuring users are aware of the necessity to fill it.


1298-1298: Set isSearchable to false for "Default-NotSearchable" in dropdown input.

This setting correctly reflects the intended functionality of the dropdown, ensuring it behaves as expected without a search feature.


1378-1382: Updated error message for "Required Field" in nested dropdown input to emphasize its mandatory nature.

Improves clarity and enforces the necessity of the field, aiding in user compliance and data integrity.


1420-1460: Introduced icons for options in "With Icons" nested dropdown input.

This addition enhances the visual appeal and usability of the dropdown, making it easier for users to identify options quickly.


1499-1499: Set isSearchable to false for "Default-NotSearchable" in nested dropdown input.

Ensures that the dropdown behaves as expected without a search feature, aligning with the specified functionality.


1627-1631: Updated error message for "Required Field" in tree dropdown input to clearly communicate its mandatory nature.

This explicit error message helps prevent user errors by clearly indicating the field's importance.


1702-1715: Added descriptions for options in "Default" nested text dropdown input.

These descriptions provide additional context to the user, enhancing the informational value of the dropdown options.


1736-1749: Added descriptions for options in "Disabled" nested text dropdown input.

These descriptions remain accessible even in a disabled state, maintaining informational value for the user.


1758-1783: Updated error message and added descriptions for options in "Required Field" nested text dropdown input.

The error message and descriptions enhance user understanding and interaction with the dropdown, ensuring they are aware of the mandatory nature of the field.


1800-1821: Introduced icons and descriptions for options in "With Icon" nested text dropdown input.

The icons and descriptions enhance the visual and informational value of the dropdown, improving user experience.


1842-1855: Added descriptions for options in "Default-NotSearchable" nested text dropdown input and set isSearchable to false.

These changes ensure that the dropdown behaves as expected without a search feature while providing valuable information to the user.


1881-1889: Minor updates to option names in "Default" profile dropdown input.

These updates may enhance clarity or align with other changes in the application context.


1909-1917: Minor updates to option names in "Disabled" profile dropdown input.

Maintains consistency in option naming across different states of the dropdown, enhancing user understanding.


1926-1945: Updated error message for "Required Field" in profile dropdown input to clearly state its mandatory nature.

This change helps ensure that users are aware of the necessity to fill this field, which is crucial for form completion and data integrity.


1966-1979: Introduced custom profile icons for options in "With CustomIcon" profile dropdown input.

These custom icons provide a unique visual identifier for each option, enhancing the user interface and making the options more recognizable.


2000-2019: Added descriptions and custom profile icons for options in "With NestedText" profile dropdown input.

These additions provide both contextual and visual enhancements to the dropdown, improving its usability and appeal.


2039-2050: Set isSearchable to false for "Default-NotSearchable" profile dropdown input.

Correctly implements the intended non-searchable functionality of the dropdown, ensuring it behaves as expected.


2126-2126: Introduced icons for options in "With Icons" multiselect dropdown input.

These icons enhance the visual appeal and usability of the dropdown, making it easier for users to identify options quickly.


2234-2274: Introduced icons for options in "With Icons" nested multiselect dropdown input.

The icons add a visual dimension to the dropdown options, enhancing user interaction and making the interface more engaging.


2426-2439: Added descriptions for options in "Default" nested text multiselect dropdown input.

These descriptions provide additional context to the user, enhancing the informational value of the dropdown options.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov merged commit 40fff07 into develop Apr 17, 2024
1 check passed
@jagankumar-egov jagankumar-egov deleted the swathi-ui-components branch April 17, 2024 09:48
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Actionable comments outside the diff hunks (1)
react/ui-components/README.md (1)

Line range hint 18-18: Consider adding a comma after "DIGIT-UI's" for better readability.

- This Package is more specific to DIGIT-UI's can be used across mission's
+ This Package is more specific to DIGIT-UI's, can be used across mission's

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
@import url("../index.scss");

.digit-checkbox-wrap {
.digit-checkbox-container {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The verification process has revealed that the old class name .digit-checkbox-wrap is still being used in the file react/css/example/index.css. This suggests that the class name change to .digit-checkbox-container has not been fully applied across all relevant files. It is recommended to update this occurrence to maintain consistency in the usage of class names throughout the project.

Analysis chain

Ensure the class name change from .digit-checkbox-wrap to .digit-checkbox-container is reflected across all relevant files.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for old class name usage in SCSS files
rg --type css '.digit-checkbox-wrap' --files-with-matches

Length of output: 85

@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ const CheckBox = ({

return (
<div
className={`digit-checkbox-wrap ${
className={`digit-checkbox-container ${
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The verification process has revealed that the class digit-checkbox-container is defined within the CSS files, specifically in checkboxV2.scss. However, the classes checkboxFirst and labelFirst were not found in any CSS files. This absence suggests that these classes are either not implemented yet or were mistakenly referenced in the code. It is recommended to either define these classes in the CSS files or adjust the code if these references are incorrect.

Analysis chain

Ensure that the new class names (digit-checkbox-container, checkboxFirst, labelFirst) are defined in the corresponding CSS files and that they do not conflict with existing styles.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for the existence and potential conflicts of new class names in CSS files
rg --type css "digit-checkbox-container|checkboxFirst|labelFirst"

Length of output: 144



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check specifically for the existence of 'checkboxFirst' and 'labelFirst' in CSS files
rg --type css "checkboxFirst|labelFirst"

Length of output: 42

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants