Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade django from 3.1.3 to 4.2.17 #23

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

officialmofabs
Copy link

@officialmofabs officialmofabs commented Dec 10, 2024

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • dev-projects/my-documaker/code/backend/requirements.txt

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Command Injection
🦉 SQL Injection

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Upgrade Django from version 3.1.3 to 4.2.17 to address security vulnerabilities.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This is a security-focused update that upgrades Django from version 3.1.3 to 4.2.17 to address two vulnerabilities identified by Snyk. The implementation is straightforward, involving a direct version bump in the requirements.txt file.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Upgrade Django package version to address security vulnerabilities
  • Update Django version from 3.1.3 to 4.2.17
  • Address two security vulnerabilities (SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-8456315 and SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-8456316)
  • Maintain compatibility with existing dependencies (asgiref, psycopg2, pytz, and sqlparse)
dev-projects/my-documaker/code/backend/requirements.txt

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:

  • It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!
  • We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.

Copy link

Report too large to display inline

View full report↗︎

Copy link

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Alert Package NoteSourceCI
Critical CVE npm/shell-quote@1.7.2 ⚠︎
Possible typosquat attack npm/xmldom@0.1.31 ⚠︎
Critical CVE npm/xmldom@0.1.31 ⚠︎
Critical CVE npm/url-parse@1.4.7 ⚠︎
Critical CVE npm/plist@3.0.1 ⚠︎

View full report↗︎

Next steps

What is a critical CVE?

Contains a Critical Common Vulnerability and Exposure (CVE).

Remove or replace dependencies that include known critical CVEs. Consumers can use dependency overrides or npm audit fix --force to remove vulnerable dependencies.

What is a typosquat?

Package name is similar to other popular packages and may not be the package you want.

Use care when consuming similarly named packages and ensure that you did not intend to consume a different package. Malicious packages often publish using similar names as existing popular packages.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/foo@1.0.0 or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/shell-quote@1.7.2
  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/xmldom@0.1.31
  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/url-parse@1.4.7
  • @SocketSecurity ignore npm/plist@3.0.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants