Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Customise RCITI branch #778

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 10, 2021
Merged

Customise RCITI branch #778

merged 8 commits into from
Aug 10, 2021

Conversation

asiripanich
Copy link
Member

@asiripanich asiripanich commented Aug 10, 2021

Merge master to rciti1 has proven to be a bad idea. So we are slowly bringing rciti1 to master instead!

  • Use random token for auth.
  • Modified the consent text.
  • Send log to a.siripanich at unsw (dot) edu.au by default.
  • Added end trip and edit user profile button.
  • and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@shankari shankari left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM overall. One major question and one suggestion.
Also, do you want to keep all the tabs? I thought you wanted to remove some of the tabs. In particular, to be consistent with the previous results, don't you need to comment out the "label" tab?

$scope.disagree = function() {
$state.go('root.main.heatmap');
};

$scope.agree = function() {
StartPrefs.markConsented().then(function(response) {
$scope.randomToken = $scope.generateRandomToken(8);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would bump this up since it is autogenerated and you are not getting the user to fill it out.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is a good number to use here? I'm still deciding whether to use a list of pre-generated tokens or not. One of the benefits is so that I can link my screening questionnaire responses to the trip database.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this is not a huge security concern.. Let's leave it like this for now.

@shankari shankari merged commit 26df155 into e-mission:rciti Aug 10, 2021
@asiripanich
Copy link
Member Author

@shankari Deploy in 10 mins? :)

@shankari
Copy link
Contributor

just pushed (had to create new channel etc), but should be live in ~ 10 mins at
https://e-mission.eecs.berkeley.edu/#/client_setup?new_client=rciti

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants