Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove vertical priority list #46741

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jkoritzinsky
Copy link
Member

Now that we've deduped our assets, we can get rid of the priority list and get back to one "main" vertical.

Depends on #46730

Now that we've deduped our assets, we can get rid of the priority list and get back to one "main" vertical.
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky added Blocked Issue is blocked on an external dependency Area-VMR labels Feb 11, 2025
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky requested review from a team as code owners February 11, 2025 23:05
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the untriaged Request triage from a team member label Feb 11, 2025
@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

Do you also want to remove the infra support for the prio list? I assume that only supporting one primary vertical will simplify the code a bit.

@jkoritzinsky
Copy link
Member Author

I was thinking of holding off on removing the infra until we get rid of the concept of a "primary" vertical, but based on the test failures it might be worth just doing now.

@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky removed the Blocked Issue is blocked on an external dependency label Feb 12, 2025
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky enabled auto-merge (squash) February 18, 2025 21:47
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky merged commit 0a9da8c into dotnet:main Feb 19, 2025
40 checks passed
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky deleted the no-priority-list branch February 19, 2025 19:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-VMR untriaged Request triage from a team member
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants