-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make assembly version logic more robust Fixes #44042 #45518
Merged
Forgind
merged 2 commits into
dotnet:release/9.0.2xx
from
Forgind:real-assembly-version
Jan 10, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you know if there are cases where each of these clauses are true? (IE will it ever be the case that
assemblyPath
doesn't exist butlibraryPath
does, or that neither of them exist?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In theory, at least, yes. This gets run as part of a (publicly available/tweakable) Task, so the user can set, for instance, what userRuntimeAssemblies are available --> whether anything gets found for assemblyPath as well as whether a library really exists on disk. This should only be for things that get copied to the output directory, but given that users can customize the inputs, I wouldn't depend on that. Good question.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think in a case like this it would be OK to change task logic. The task isn't meant for public consumption, so it's probably OK to make a minor change that probably won't break people even if they are using it.
FYI @baronfel @marcpopMSFT
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think in a case like this it would be OK to change task logic. The task isn't meant for public consumption, so it's probably OK to make a minor change that probably won't break people even if they are using it.
FYI @baronfel @marcpopMSFT
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Totally agree with Daniel here.