Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use forattributename jsgenerator #78136

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 17, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -35,21 +35,9 @@ public void Initialize(IncrementalGeneratorInitializationContext context)
{
// Collect all methods adorned with JSExportAttribute
var attributedMethods = context.SyntaxProvider
.CreateSyntaxProvider(
static (node, ct) => ShouldVisitNode(node),
static (context, ct) =>
{
MethodDeclarationSyntax syntax = (MethodDeclarationSyntax)context.Node;
if (context.SemanticModel.GetDeclaredSymbol(syntax, ct) is IMethodSymbol methodSymbol
&& methodSymbol.GetAttributes().Any(static attribute => attribute.AttributeClass?.ToDisplayString() == Constants.JSExportAttribute))
{
return new { Syntax = syntax, Symbol = methodSymbol };
}

return null;
})
.Where(
static modelData => modelData is not null);
.ForAttributeWithMetadataName(Constants.JSExportAttribute,
static (node, ct) => node is MethodDeclarationSyntax,
static (context, ct) => new { Syntax = (MethodDeclarationSyntax)context.TargetNode, Symbol = (IMethodSymbol)context.TargetSymbol });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are pushing symbols down in the pipeline, which affects incrementality.

Fixing it may require more extensive refactorings which I don't know if it can be backported, but I think for this PR that will go to 8, we should do it the right way.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree with the symbols issue, but this was being done before. This PR doesn't change that, just makes the existing logic more efficient.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This generator (along with the rest of the interop generators) use symbols for a few steps until we are able to build a model that does not contain symbols at a named step "CalculateStubInformation". From that point onwards, the generators are incremental. We can't do incrementality earlier as we need to get the symbols as well as some additional information from the Compilation.


// Validate if attributed methods can have source generated
var methodsWithDiagnostics = attributedMethods.Select(static (data, ct) =>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -233,19 +221,6 @@ private static (MemberDeclarationSyntax, ImmutableArray<Diagnostic>) GenerateSou
return (PrintGeneratedSource(incrementalContext.StubMethodSyntaxTemplate, incrementalContext.SignatureContext, incrementalContext.ContainingSyntaxContext, wrapper, registration), incrementalContext.Diagnostics.Array.AddRange(diagnostics.Diagnostics));
}

private static bool ShouldVisitNode(SyntaxNode syntaxNode)
{
// We only support C# method declarations.
if (syntaxNode.Language != LanguageNames.CSharp
|| !syntaxNode.IsKind(SyntaxKind.MethodDeclaration))
{
return false;
}

// Filter out methods with no attributes early.
return ((MethodDeclarationSyntax)syntaxNode).AttributeLists.Count > 0;
}

private static Diagnostic? GetDiagnosticIfInvalidMethodForGeneration(MethodDeclarationSyntax methodSyntax, IMethodSymbol method)
{
// Verify the method has no generic types or defined implementation
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -37,21 +37,9 @@ public void Initialize(IncrementalGeneratorInitializationContext context)
{
// Collect all methods adorned with JSImportAttribute
var attributedMethods = context.SyntaxProvider
.CreateSyntaxProvider(
static (node, ct) => ShouldVisitNode(node),
static (context, ct) =>
{
MethodDeclarationSyntax syntax = (MethodDeclarationSyntax)context.Node;
if (context.SemanticModel.GetDeclaredSymbol(syntax, ct) is IMethodSymbol methodSymbol
&& methodSymbol.GetAttributes().Any(static attribute => attribute.AttributeClass?.ToDisplayString() == Constants.JSImportAttribute))
{
return new { Syntax = syntax, Symbol = methodSymbol };
}

return null;
})
.Where(
static modelData => modelData is not null);
.ForAttributeWithMetadataName(Constants.JSImportAttribute,
static (node, ct) => node is MethodDeclarationSyntax,
static (context, ct) => new { Syntax = (MethodDeclarationSyntax)context.TargetNode, Symbol = (IMethodSymbol)context.TargetSymbol });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same.


// Validate if attributed methods can have source generated
var methodsWithDiagnostics = attributedMethods.Select(static (data, ct) =>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -244,19 +232,6 @@ private static (MemberDeclarationSyntax, ImmutableArray<Diagnostic>) GenerateSou
return (PrintGeneratedSource(incrementalContext.StubMethodSyntaxTemplate, incrementalContext.SignatureContext, incrementalContext.ContainingSyntaxContext, code), incrementalContext.Diagnostics.Array.AddRange(diagnostics.Diagnostics));
}

private static bool ShouldVisitNode(SyntaxNode syntaxNode)
{
// We only support C# method declarations.
if (syntaxNode.Language != LanguageNames.CSharp
|| !syntaxNode.IsKind(SyntaxKind.MethodDeclaration))
{
return false;
}

// Filter out methods with no attributes early.
return ((MethodDeclarationSyntax)syntaxNode).AttributeLists.Count > 0;
}

private static Diagnostic? GetDiagnosticIfInvalidMethodForGeneration(MethodDeclarationSyntax methodSyntax, IMethodSymbol method)
{
// Verify the method has no generic types or defined implementation
Expand Down