-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use forattributename jsgenerator #78136
Merged
chsienki
merged 3 commits into
dotnet:main
from
chsienki:use_forattributename_jsgenerator
Nov 17, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -37,21 +37,9 @@ public void Initialize(IncrementalGeneratorInitializationContext context) | |
{ | ||
// Collect all methods adorned with JSImportAttribute | ||
var attributedMethods = context.SyntaxProvider | ||
.CreateSyntaxProvider( | ||
static (node, ct) => ShouldVisitNode(node), | ||
static (context, ct) => | ||
{ | ||
MethodDeclarationSyntax syntax = (MethodDeclarationSyntax)context.Node; | ||
if (context.SemanticModel.GetDeclaredSymbol(syntax, ct) is IMethodSymbol methodSymbol | ||
&& methodSymbol.GetAttributes().Any(static attribute => attribute.AttributeClass?.ToDisplayString() == Constants.JSImportAttribute)) | ||
{ | ||
return new { Syntax = syntax, Symbol = methodSymbol }; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return null; | ||
}) | ||
.Where( | ||
static modelData => modelData is not null); | ||
.ForAttributeWithMetadataName(Constants.JSImportAttribute, | ||
static (node, ct) => node is MethodDeclarationSyntax, | ||
static (context, ct) => new { Syntax = (MethodDeclarationSyntax)context.TargetNode, Symbol = (IMethodSymbol)context.TargetSymbol }); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same. |
||
|
||
// Validate if attributed methods can have source generated | ||
var methodsWithDiagnostics = attributedMethods.Select(static (data, ct) => | ||
|
@@ -244,19 +232,6 @@ private static (MemberDeclarationSyntax, ImmutableArray<Diagnostic>) GenerateSou | |
return (PrintGeneratedSource(incrementalContext.StubMethodSyntaxTemplate, incrementalContext.SignatureContext, incrementalContext.ContainingSyntaxContext, code), incrementalContext.Diagnostics.Array.AddRange(diagnostics.Diagnostics)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static bool ShouldVisitNode(SyntaxNode syntaxNode) | ||
{ | ||
// We only support C# method declarations. | ||
if (syntaxNode.Language != LanguageNames.CSharp | ||
|| !syntaxNode.IsKind(SyntaxKind.MethodDeclaration)) | ||
{ | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Filter out methods with no attributes early. | ||
return ((MethodDeclarationSyntax)syntaxNode).AttributeLists.Count > 0; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static Diagnostic? GetDiagnosticIfInvalidMethodForGeneration(MethodDeclarationSyntax methodSyntax, IMethodSymbol method) | ||
{ | ||
// Verify the method has no generic types or defined implementation | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are pushing symbols down in the pipeline, which affects incrementality.
Fixing it may require more extensive refactorings which I don't know if it can be backported, but I think for this PR that will go to 8, we should do it the right way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree with the symbols issue, but this was being done before. This PR doesn't change that, just makes the existing logic more efficient.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This generator (along with the rest of the interop generators) use symbols for a few steps until we are able to build a model that does not contain symbols at a named step "CalculateStubInformation". From that point onwards, the generators are incremental. We can't do incrementality earlier as we need to get the symbols as well as some additional information from the Compilation.