Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "[browser][MT] move wasm MT CI legs to extra-platforms" #112712

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

lewing
Copy link
Member

@lewing lewing commented Feb 19, 2025

Reverts #112690

@Copilot Copilot bot review requested due to automatic review settings February 19, 2025 21:27
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Feb 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

@lewing lewing requested a review from jkoritzinsky February 19, 2025 21:28
@lewing lewing requested a review from agocke February 19, 2025 21:29
@lewing
Copy link
Member Author

lewing commented Feb 19, 2025

/ba-g fast merge

@lewing lewing merged commit d6b6298 into main Feb 19, 2025
13 of 19 checks passed
@lewing lewing deleted the revert-112690-browser_no_MT_on_runtime_pipeline branch February 19, 2025 21:30
grendello pushed a commit to grendello/runtime that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2025
akoeplinger added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2025
…)" (#112716)

* Revert "Revert "[browser][MT] move wasm MT CI legs to extra-platforms (#11269…"

This reverts commit d6b6298.

* Only include multithreaded job dependency when we have it

* Fixup

* Keep MT build for WBT

* Remove WASI from runtime.yml too, keep it only in extra-platforms

* Keep build-only WBT in runtime.yml
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants