Avoid SerialPort IOLoop when there's no event handlers #102829
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR avoids starting the
SerialPort
I/O loop uncondtionally on Unix.dotnet/corefx#40383 added support for the
PinChanged
event on the Unix version ofSerialStream
.However, since
SerialPort
was always subscribing toSerialStream.PinChanged
, this had the side effect of always starting theIOLoop
, even when no events were actually subscribed on theSerialPort
.This PR changes this behavior.
SerialStream.PinChanged
is only subscribed to ifSerialPort.PinChanged
has handlers.This mimics the logic for the
DataReceived
event.When no events are subscribed, opening a
SerialPort
without reading or writing now doesn't use any CPU.First part of fixing #2379 (CPU usage still remains high when reading/writing).