-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[mono][workload] Cross compiler pack fails to install on browser due to permission setting #54612
Labels
Milestone
Comments
Tagging subscribers to 'arch-wasm': @lewing Issue DetailsThe permission setting fix broke wasm workloads
|
found while testing #54342 |
steveisok
pushed a commit
to steveisok/runtime
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2021
We introduced Microsoft.NETCore.App.MonoCrossAOT.UnixFilePermissions.xml in dotnet#54501 to make sure the right permissions are set when installing AOT compiler workload packs. We hardcoded the list to include mono-aot-cross, llc, and opt. However, in wasm's case they only have mono-aot-cross. This change makes the xml file a template and only includes mono-aot-cross for browser and all three for the other configurations. Fixes dotnet#54612
we will also need a check/fix in emsdk |
lewing
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2021
* Fix MonoCrossAOT.UnixFilePermissions for wasm We introduced Microsoft.NETCore.App.MonoCrossAOT.UnixFilePermissions.xml in #54501 to make sure the right permissions are set when installing AOT compiler workload packs. We hardcoded the list to include mono-aot-cross, llc, and opt. However, in wasm's case they only have mono-aot-cross. This change makes the xml file a template and only includes mono-aot-cross for browser and all three for the other configurations. Fixes #54612 * Use property instead of item for the file nodes * Ankit suggestion Co-authored-by: Steve Pfister <steve.pfister@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The permission setting fix broke wasm workloads
cc @steveisok @directhex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: