-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Parsing Using Var #28315
Merged
fayrose
merged 12 commits into
dotnet:features/enhanced-using
from
fayrose:using-var-parsing
Jul 16, 2018
Merged
Parsing Using Var #28315
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7fb24dc
Parsing
b4608e6
Requested changes
81632c1
Most of statement parsing tests
50779d4
Special case tree tests
3d73621
Reverts binder changes
686f245
Minor fix
249b490
Test fix
68426cf
More tests and bug fix
208e8db
Differentiated IdentifierNames
a2b5d0f
Added IdentifierToken differentiators
70bfd1f
Indenting fix
81d4440
added prototype comment
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'm not s huge fan of repurposing this node in this manner. It feels more appropriate as a new sort of node.
But i could be convinced otherwise. #Closed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I rather like it. Tagging @gafter for advice on the shape of the syntax tree (extend local declarations, or create a dedicated kind of node?).
In reply to: 200508613 [](ancestors = 200508613)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is usually what we do when we augment nodes. For instance, when we added
ref
locals we didn't add new types of local declarations, we just added optionalref
modifiers. I think it's the same situation here. #ResolvedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, i'm on the fence. Something feels... 'wonky' here. Perhaps because 'using' bridges between two things (using-statements, and local-var-statements). That's unlike 'ref'.
That said, this may just need some time on my part to get used to it. So this is not at all strong pushback. If the team feels like this is "good", then i have no objection. #Resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could it be parsed into
Modifiers
on LocalDeclaration? Currently Modifiers is only used forconst
.