Annotate System.Runtime.CompilerServices.VisualC for nullable referen…

…ce types (#41858) This assembly really doesn't matter for nullability, as it's only meant to be used with C++/CLI and only by infrastructure. There's also no annotations necessary on any of the contained attributes, as they are either parameterless or take a parameter that shouldn't be null. Even so, we may as well mark the assembly as being annotated, so that its status is appropriately reflected by tools.
dotnet · Oct 17, 2019 · 57e3031 · 57e3031
1 parent 2177ff1
commit 57e3031
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 2 additions and 0 deletions.
diff --git a/...ystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.VisualC/ref/System.Runtime.CompilerServices.VisualC.csproj b/...ystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.VisualC/ref/System.Runtime.CompilerServices.VisualC.csproj
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
   <PropertyGroup>
+    <Nullable>enable</Nullable>
     <Configurations>netcoreapp-Debug;netcoreapp-Release</Configurations>
   </PropertyGroup>
   <ItemGroup>

diff --git a/...ystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.VisualC/src/System.Runtime.CompilerServices.VisualC.csproj b/...ystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.VisualC/src/System.Runtime.CompilerServices.VisualC.csproj
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
   <PropertyGroup>
     <AssemblyName>System.Runtime.CompilerServices.VisualC</AssemblyName>
+    <Nullable>enable</Nullable>
     <Configurations>netcoreapp-Debug;netcoreapp-Release</Configurations>
   </PropertyGroup>
   <!-- Shared CoreCLR -->