Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed non-phpdoc @internal tags #744

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2014
Merged

Removed non-phpdoc @internal tags #744

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2014

Conversation

acrobat
Copy link
Contributor

@acrobat acrobat commented Dec 15, 2014

Removed 2 @internal phpdoc tags as they were about old internal api usage and these methods are public api as @beberlei & @Ocramius confirmed on irc #doctrine

ocramius: the @internal are old comments that were used to tell information about internal API usage
ocramius: they are not the @internal of phpdoc, so you are welcome to send a PR to fix that

@doctrinebot
Copy link

Hello,

thank you for creating this pull request. I have automatically opened an issue
on our Jira Bug Tracker for you. See the issue link:

http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/browse/DBAL-1075

We use Jira to track the state of pull requests and the versions they got
included in.

@Ocramius Ocramius self-assigned this Dec 16, 2014
Ocramius added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2014
@Ocramius Ocramius merged commit 8bf95aa into doctrine:master Dec 16, 2014
@Ocramius
Copy link
Member

@acrobat thanks!

@acrobat acrobat deleted the internal-doc-fix branch December 16, 2014 08:15
@@ -969,8 +967,6 @@ public function query()
* @return integer The number of affected rows.
*
* @throws \Doctrine\DBAL\DBALException
*
* @internal PERF: Directly prepares a driver statement, not a wrapper.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should the comment be removed though ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@stof yeah, it's fine

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants