-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixes incorrect database migration for quoted columns #3395
Conversation
…nother is not I am not sure this is correct just testing if other tests will not fail
foreach ($this->_localColumnNames as $localColumn) { | ||
if (strtolower($indexColumn) === strtolower($localColumn->getName())) { | ||
if (strtolower($indexColumn) === strtolower($localColumn->trimQuotes($localColumn->getName()))) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure that I have to trim quotes for $localColumn->getName()
this should already be unquoted?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm unfamiliar with this either but it feels bad. An unquoted column name is the value itself, a quoted column name is a SQL expression representing this value. Why would we want to mix them and compare by trimming quotes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@morozov maybe I did not understand you. I need them to ignore escaping because of #3387 while debugging I noticed that for up and down migrations it compares escaped or unescaped values and generates or not gerenates migration. This place checks if the column name is included in the foreign constraint and it should not matter if it is escaped or not should say it is in both cases. I just not sure about this $localColumn->trimQuotes($localColumn->getName())
.
Also I am not sure this will not break other parts but tests looks green so maybe ok?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's a valid case for DBAL. Right now there's no difference between quoted and unquoted identifiers in the DBAL type system but it doesn't mean it should handle them transparently. Most likely, there's a lot of other cases where mixing quoted and unquoted identifiers will cause unexpected behavior.
Instead of changing the comparison logic in DBAL, I'd try to fix the inconsistency on the calling side.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this a valid case where a database allows reserved words when they are quoted?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@SenseException this is the case where I spotted this with migration for this did not work becouse "`group`"
is escaped with `
* @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Group")
* @ORM\JoinColumn(name="`group`", referencedColumnName="id")
@morozov I can find only one place where this method is called https://github.com/doctrine/dbal/blob/master/lib/Doctrine/DBAL/Platforms/MySqlPlatform.php#L829
so you suggest create one more method for same problem and don't use old one(witch I think is buggy)?
anyway, feel free to close this if you think this is a bad fix for #3387 and create better one. But this worked for my use case.
@@ -16,14 +16,9 @@ class ForeignKeyConstraintTest extends TestCase | |||
*/ | |||
public function testIntersectsIndexColumns(array $indexColumns, $expectedResult) | |||
{ | |||
$foreignKey = new ForeignKeyConstraint(['foo', 'bar'], 'foreign_table', ['fk_foo', 'fk_bar']); | |||
$foreignKey = new ForeignKeyConstraint(['foo', '`bar`'], 'foreign_table', ['fk_foo', 'fk_bar']); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please design a new test: don't modify existing ones.
If an existing test is being modified out of necessity, we will likely hit a BC break scenario.
foreach ($this->_localColumnNames as $localColumn) { | ||
if (strtolower($indexColumn) === strtolower($localColumn->getName())) { | ||
if (strtolower($indexColumn) === strtolower($localColumn->trimQuotes($localColumn->getName()))) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
foreach ($this->_localColumnNames as $localColumn) { | ||
if (strtolower($indexColumn) === strtolower($localColumn->getName())) { | ||
if (strtolower($indexColumn) === strtolower($localColumn->trimQuotes($localColumn->getName()))) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's a valid case for DBAL. Right now there's no difference between quoted and unquoted identifiers in the DBAL type system but it doesn't mean it should handle them transparently. Most likely, there's a lot of other cases where mixing quoted and unquoted identifiers will cause unexpected behavior.
Instead of changing the comparison logic in DBAL, I'd try to fix the inconsistency on the calling side.
@Ocramius I have created a new test, is it ok now? |
* | ||
* @dataProvider getIntersectsIndexColumnsData | ||
*/ | ||
public function testIntersectsIndexEscapedColumns(array $indexColumns, $expectedResult) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's $expectedResult
? Needs type documentation here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess I could add bool type hint here. Is that would be ok? or I have to update doc block?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding a type declaration would be best (instead of docblock)
$index->expects($this->once()) | ||
->method('getColumns') | ||
->will($this->returnValue($indexColumns)); | ||
$index = new Index('INDEX_NAME', $indexColumns); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm vary of test changes here: what was broken that required getting rid of the mock?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nothing, just thought maybe better to use an actual object instead of mock no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the previous code works without changes, let's avoid changing it at all. Let's put test refactoring in separate patches, to avoid hiding potential BC breaks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Ocramius as you can see tests fail and now I remember why. Because I use getUnquotedColumns
instead of getColumns
and I added some columns with quotes into data provider. And if I mock here can't test quoted names. I mean this:
$index->expects($this->once())
->method('getUnquotedColumns')
->will($this->returnValue($indexColumns));
should always return unquoted names and I can't add quoted names in data provider but maybe I don't have to?
I still think actual implementation would be better here and anyway I have to change mocked method anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Ocramius if you want I can still leave this mock but will have to change mocked method and will also have to duplicate this test and test data to actually test quoted names.
…t I decided go with actual implementation
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ public function intersectsIndexColumns(Index $index) | |||
{ | |||
foreach ($index->getUnquotedColumns() as $indexColumn) { | |||
foreach ($this->_localColumnNames as $localColumn) { | |||
if (strtolower($indexColumn) === strtolower($localColumn->trimQuotes($localColumn->getName()))) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it seems this was not required testIntersectsIndexEscapedColumns
should cover this
Given that this is a cross-platform change, we need a new functional test that reproduces the problem. Just a unit test that covers some implementation details doesn't tell anyone anything. |
maybe you are right. But I think this is just a bug I don't know database with could say they are different columns just because it is quoted for example And about a test, I am not sure how to test this it does not treat it as the same column and you say it is not a bug as I understand. You can see an example here #3387 but I don't know how to write a test for this. Maybe someone could help or write a test for this. Or at least some kind of similar example I could write a test if this is a bug. |
I usually am.
No.
I’m not saying it's not a bug. I’m saying that the unit test doesn't represent the bug.
As for the high-level “what the expected test should look like”, please look at |
Summary
I think this should accept as the same column if one is quoted and other is not