Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make guard against unmatchable matchers less strict to enable user-based wildcard matching #1202
Make guard against unmatchable matchers less strict to enable user-based wildcard matching #1202
Changes from 1 commit
a251966
24b8d8a
f315474
2745506
308d711
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Ideally, we wouldn't have any conditionals here. We ought to be able to simply ask the
Match
object directly what type of values it targets.I also suspect that we currently don't have any tests covering this
else
block.For both reasons, it'd be nice to simplify this whole
if
–else
block to something non-conditional, but this is more of a bonus—you can leave this code as is for now.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wouldn't mind making a new ticket to clean it up. I'd like to get this in and working first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you are willing to clean this up, then I say, let's do it now. (It should be a fairly trivial change, see my earlier comment over in the issue about adding some
Type
property toMatch
.)