-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: fix failures and correlation in proxy #28094
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
67f5dfe
fix: fix failures and correlation in proxy -- run ci
ryanthemanuel f12bdc7
fix: fix failures and correlation in proxy -- run ci
ryanthemanuel 2830f21
add unit tests
ryanthemanuel e20834c
add changelog entry
ryanthemanuel d1fd7ea
PR comments
ryanthemanuel de66b7b
Update cli/CHANGELOG.md
ryanthemanuel f62e744
Update CHANGELOG.md
ryanthemanuel 6505991
Update CHANGELOG.md
ryanthemanuel fbc266d
Merge branch 'develop' into ryanm/fix/proxy-fun
ryanthemanuel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This coercion is needed because ctx is
HttpMiddlewareCtx<any>
, which causesctx
to beany
.Removing this templated
any
results in a couple of typescript errors that may be indicative of bugs; one of which is indeferSourceMapRewrite
which should be returning a string instead of void (unless the fn definition on L#320 is more correct than the type definition on L#68). Can resolving the ambiguous definition ofctx
be rolled into this PR, or is that out of scope?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think at this point given I want to try and get this in for tomorrow, that I'll call this out of scope for now. It's a good find though. This can definitely be cleaned up at some point.