-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 673
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: adding e2e upgrade test for v7.1 localhost #3164
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! I just had a few small comments but no blockers
@@ -549,6 +551,35 @@ func (s *UpgradeTestSuite) TestV6ToV7ChainUpgrade() { | |||
}) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func (s *UpgradeTestSuite) TestV7ChainUpgradeAddLocalhost() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
love how simple this test is 🥇
Co-authored-by: Cian Hatton <cian@interchain.io>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wahoo! 🎉
Pretty cool to have an e2e upgrade migration tests for v7 -> v7.1, with super small diffs! |
e2e/tests/upgrades/upgrade_test.go
Outdated
|
||
t.Run("upgrade chain", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
govProposalWallet := s.CreateUserOnChainA(ctx, testvalues.StartingTokenAmount) | ||
s.UpgradeChain(ctx, chain, govProposalWallet, v71.UpgradeName, testCfg.ChainAConfig.Tag, testCfg.UpgradeTag) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this needs to be updated?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated! need to get the fix in #3172 included in this branch too. The else if
we added earlier caused some weird issues in CI.
Description
closes: #3033
Commit Message / Changelog Entry
NA
see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/
) or specification (x/<module>/spec/
).godoc
comments.Files changed
in the Github PR explorer.Codecov Report
in the comment section below once CI passes.