-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(server/v2): router service #19696
Conversation
Important Auto Review SkippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please add the base/target branch pattern to the list of additional branches to be reviewed in the settings. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
aceeae3
to
dfd0041
Compare
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
not stale, just blocked |
I suppose this is still blocked on this eventhough we don't go with hybrid handler: #19639 correct? cc @testinginprod |
// Use InvokeUntyped if the response type is not known. | ||
func (m *msgRouterService) InvokeTyped(ctx context.Context, msg, resp protoiface.MessageV1) error { | ||
var err error | ||
resp, err = m.handler(ctx, msg) |
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Useless assignment to local variable Warning
// Use InvokeUntyped if the response type is not known. | ||
func (m *queryRouterService) InvokeTyped(ctx context.Context, req, resp protoiface.MessageV1) error { | ||
var err error | ||
resp, err = m.handler(ctx, req) |
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Useless assignment to local variable Warning
@julienrbrt your pull request is missing a changelog! |
runtime/v2/module.go
Outdated
@@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ func ProvideEnvironment(logger log.Logger, config *runtimev2.Module, key depinje | |||
EventService: stf.NewEventService(), | |||
GasService: stf.NewGasMeterService(), | |||
HeaderService: stf.HeaderService{}, | |||
RouterService: stf.NewRouterService(kvService, app.app.queryRouterBuilder, app.app.msgRouterBuilder), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be cleaner to just place MessageRouterService
and QueryRouterService
as fields on Environment instead of nesting them behind a getter in RouterService
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Something we should do consistently on main afterwards given we have the same on main.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
makes senes to me i shall flag a TODO
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
78bc9cd
to
8305095
Compare
8305095
to
18fca65
Compare
should we make this against main since stf is there now |
idtso, it's part of the runtime/v2 PR (branch its targeting now) |
1becc15
to
df04a11
Compare
…ulien/runtimev2-service
Description
Closes: #19542, #19324
Blocked on #20320
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...