-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do not produce NaNs in SiPixelActionExecutor
#34900
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34900/24708
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d009db/17813/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Thanks @mmusich !! |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
is there any interest for backports? @tvami |
I don't insist, but maybe it would be nice to have in 12_0_X, there we still can have bugfix PRs. And also for 11_3_X if that's going to be used for the cosmics rereco. |
resolves #34890
PR description:
Title says is all.
PR validation:
Run wf 8.0 with
runTheMatrix.py -l 8.0 -j 8
and inspected output DQM ROOT file.if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Not a backport, but it could be backported to all (?) production releases