-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backport of fix for genJetAK8ID matching in fatJetMCTable #33990
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @laurenhay for CMSSW_10_6_X. It involves the following packages: PhysicsTools/NanoAOD @cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bd2f29/15689/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
@laurenhay
|
urgent (mark what is needed for the nanov9) |
Pull request #33990 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bd2f29/15703/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+xpog changes inline with master; extra change to protect nanov8 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_6_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Fixes issue where the GenJetAK8IDx matching did not match the corresponding GenJetAK8Table id's because of a difference in pT cut between the collections being referenced by the jet tables
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/JetMET/2103.htm
PR validation:
Validated on file in question in 10_6_19_patch2.
We scanned the file in 10_6_19_patch2 before changes and got the same output Matej saw:
After the change, I reproduced a subset of the events using this cmsDriver command:
And the resulting output from scanning the file was:
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Original PR:
#33839
Backport requested for production