-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding UL16 PUID and fixing QGL values in nanoAOD #33925
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33925/23003
|
A new Pull Request was created by @alefisico (Alejandro Gomez Espinosa) for master. It involves the following packages: PhysicsTools/NanoAOD @cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test with #33857 |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test runtestPhysicsToolsNanoAOD had ERRORS RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
|
test parameters: pull_request = cms-data/RecoJets-JetProducers#13 |
please test with #33857 |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test runtestPhysicsToolsNanoAOD had ERRORS RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
|
Probably both PR need to be mentioned together with comma separated.
|
please test with #33857,cms-data/RecoJets-JetProducers#13 |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test runtestPhysicsToolsNanoAOD had ERRORS RelVals
RelVals-INPUT
|
|
Hi @mariadalfonso I don't know if the next build is available for testing. |
test parameters: |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c88107/15590/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+xpog changes inline with the description |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
PR validation:
runTheMatrix
andscram build code-format
without errors.FYI @camclean @singh-ramanpreet