-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[JME NanoAOD] Changes for event size reduction #32722
[JME NanoAOD] Changes for event size reduction #32722
Conversation
…ets. Build and add separate AK8 Gen and AK8 Puppi jet collections for JEC studies. Some cleanup.
FYI JMAR convenors @camclean @alefisico |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32722/20859
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32722/20860
|
A new Pull Request was created by @nurfikri89 (Nurfikri Norjoharuddeen) for master. It involves the following packages: PhysicsTools/NanoAOD @perrotta, @gouskos, @cmsbuild, @fgolf, @slava77, @jpata, @mariadalfonso can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-43558c/12493/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test workflow 25202.15,10224.15,11024.15 (to test JMEnano workflow) |
@andrzejnovak |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-43558c/12507/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
"enabled" : False, | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
"jet" : "ak6gen", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the motivation for the change from ak8 -> ak6 in the naming ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had set the new AK8 GEN jet collection reclustering in a function here. The change in the line above is just to put a dummy example using ak6gen. The ak6gen jet clustering is switched off.
@mariadalfonso afaik btv is not using this JME Nano |
+xpog All tests passed, and changes to the code are consistent with the PR description |
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
…reduction [JME NanoAOD] Backport of #32722 (Changes for event size reduction) to 10_6_X
…reduction [JME NanoAOD] Backport of #32722 (Changes for event size reduction) to 11_2_X
PR description:
This PR is to reduce the size of custom JME NanoAODs. The following changes are made:
npuProd[ibx].getPU_pT_hats()
size is more than 0 inPhysicsTools/NanoAOD/plugins/NPUTablesProducer.cc
.RecoJets/JetProducers/python/ak4GenJets_cfi.py
.With this PR, the event size is now reduced to 6.42 kb/event from 9.32 kb/event. The comparison was made using 10K events from a TTJets RunIISummer19UL17MiniAOD sample. The changes in this PR was discussed in the 13/01/2021 XPOG meeting [1].
[1] https://indico.cern.ch/event/978436/
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Once merged, this PR needs to be backported to 10_6_X, for the ultra legacy campaigns.