Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NanoAOD: backport to 10_6_X branch of muon pT > 15 GeV passthrough, addition of isotrack charge and muon isStandalone flag. #32107

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 28, 2021

Conversation

mdunser
Copy link
Contributor

@mdunser mdunser commented Nov 11, 2020

PR description:

backport to 10_6_X branch of muon pT > 15 GeV passthrough, regardless of ID

this is the backport of PR #32103
additional backports of #33208 and #33212

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 11, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @mdunser for CMSSW_10_6_X.

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/NanoAOD

@cmsbuild, @santocch, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@gpetruc, @peruzzim, @swertz this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 11, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: b5f2966
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3b2788/10651/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_6_X_2020-11-11-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc700

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3b2788/10651/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 71 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3214708
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 115
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3214259
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 140 log files, 14 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #32103

@silviodonato silviodonato marked this pull request as draft November 16, 2020 16:40
@cmsbuild cmsbuild mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2020
@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

@mdunser

please update this backport based on the review in master,
note that we need to safeguard the current ongoing v8 production in 10_6_X
(run2_nanoAOD_106Xv1 & ~run2_nanoAOD_devel).toModify(xyzTable , xyxVariable = None)

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3b2788/14343/summary.html
COMMIT: 3f0509b
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_6_X_2021-04-19-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc700
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/32107/14343/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

  • 136.7611136.7611_RunJetHT2016E_reminiaod+RunJetHT2016E_reminiaod+REMINIAOD_data2016_HIPM+HARVESTDR2_REMINIAOD_data2016_HIPM/step2_RunJetHT2016E_reminiaod+RunJetHT2016E_reminiaod+REMINIAOD_data2016_HIPM+HARVESTDR2_REMINIAOD_data2016_HIPM.log

RelVals-INPUT

  • 136.7611136.7611_RunJetHT2016E_reminiaod+RunJetHT2016E_reminiaod+REMINIAOD_data2016_HIPM+HARVESTDR2_REMINIAOD_data2016_HIPM/step2_RunJetHT2016E_reminiaod+RunJetHT2016E_reminiaod+REMINIAOD_data2016_HIPM+HARVESTDR2_REMINIAOD_data2016_HIPM.log
  • 136.7721136.7721_RunJetHT2016H_reminiaod+RunJetHT2016H_reminiaod+REMINIAOD_data2016+HARVESTDR2_REMINIAOD_data2016/step2_RunJetHT2016H_reminiaod+RunJetHT2016H_reminiaod+REMINIAOD_data2016+HARVESTDR2_REMINIAOD_data2016.log
  • 136.7722136.7722_RunJetHT2016H_nano+RunJetHT2016H_nano+NANOEDM2016_80X+HARVESTNANOAOD2016_80X/step2_RunJetHT2016H_nano+RunJetHT2016H_nano+NANOEDM2016_80X+HARVESTNANOAOD2016_80X.log
Expand to see more relval errors ...

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

@mdunser @sroychow
please have a look

File "/cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/32107/14343/CMSSW_10_6_X_2021-04-19-2300/python/DQMOffline/Configuration/DQMOffline_cff.py", line 190, in <module>
   from PhysicsTools.NanoAOD.nanoDQM_cff import nanoDQM
 File "/cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/32107/14343/CMSSW_10_6_X_2021-04-19-2300/python/PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/nanoDQM_cff.py", line 83, in <module>
   _Isotk_nocharge = [plot for plot in nanoDQM.vplots.IsoTrack.plots if plot.name.value() != 'charge']
AttributeError: 'PSet' object has no attribute 'IsoTrack'

@gouskos
Copy link
Contributor

gouskos commented Apr 20, 2021

@mdunser @sroychow
please have a look

File "/cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/32107/14343/CMSSW_10_6_X_2021-04-19-2300/python/DQMOffline/Configuration/DQMOffline_cff.py", line 190, in <module>
   from PhysicsTools.NanoAOD.nanoDQM_cff import nanoDQM
 File "/cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/32107/14343/CMSSW_10_6_X_2021-04-19-2300/python/PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/nanoDQM_cff.py", line 83, in <module>
   _Isotk_nocharge = [plot for plot in nanoDQM.vplots.IsoTrack.plots if plot.name.value() != 'charge']
AttributeError: 'PSet' object has no attribute 'IsoTrack'

You should do something like here:
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/3f0509b3f96b114c99735f836ee8e1e79728d6f3/PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanoDQM_cff.py#L70-78

@sroychow
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @gouskos the lines added for the Isotrack should work in principle since it does the same thing done in line 71 - 75. The problem in my opinion comes from line 67 since for run2_miniAOD_80XLegacy, the IsoTrack Pset is removed. The simplest solution is to move line 67 to the end of the file(this works in the local tests I did).

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #32107 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please check and sign again.

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3b2788/14539/summary.html
COMMIT: eabe843
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_6_X_2021-04-23-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc700
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/32107/14539/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 158 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3215541
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 76
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3215131
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.329 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 136.8523 ): 0.329 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • Checked 143 log files, 29 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

+xpog

changes inline with master (3PRs backport)
106Xv1 unchanged

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_6_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Apr 28, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 15e312a into cms-sw:CMSSW_10_6_X Apr 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants