Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move Sequence to Task for RecoHI RecoEgamma #28300

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 8, 2019

Conversation

jeongeun
Copy link
Contributor

@jeongeun jeongeun commented Oct 29, 2019

PR description: Move Sequence to Task for RecoHI RecoEgamma cff python files related to hi and cosmic part.

(An extension of the previous task PR#25163, PR#27474 , PR#27640, PR#27887, PR#28050 )

Tested in CMSSW_11_0_X_2019_10_24-2300, the basic test all passed in the CMSSW PR instructions.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28300/12496

  • This PR adds an extra 112KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jeongeun (JeongEun Lee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoEgamma/Configuration
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronProducers
RecoEgamma/EgammaPhotonProducers
RecoEgamma/PhotonIdentification
RecoHI/Configuration
RecoHI/HiEgammaAlgos
RecoHI/HiJetAlgos
RecoHI/HiMuonAlgos
RecoHI/HiTracking
RecoJets/Configuration
RecoLocalCalo/Configuration
RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecProducers
RecoLocalTracker/Configuration
TrackingTools/GsfTracking

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@echabert, @rappoccio, @yslai, @felicepantaleo, @jainshilpi, @yduhm, @MiheeJo, @echapon, @threus, @varuns23, @seemasharmafnal, @jdolen, @makortel, @lgray, @apsallid, @yenjie, @pieterdavid, @yetkinyilmaz, @Sam-Harper, @afiqaize, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @jdamgov, @bellan, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @alesaggio, @ebrondol, @argiro, @dgulhan, @clelange, @mandrenguyen, @gbenelli, @jazzitup, @ahinzmann, @sobhatta, @kurtejung, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @mmusich this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 29, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/3211/console Started: 2019/10/29 08:45

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: ce725e4

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d6a6f6/3211/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
140.53 step2

runTheMatrix-results/140.53_RunHI2011+RunHI2011+RECOHID11+HARVESTDHI/step2_RunHI2011+RunHI2011+RECOHID11+HARVESTDHI.log

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 8, 2019

Pull request #28300 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Nov 8, 2019

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 8, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/3387/console Started: 2019/11/08 10:14

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 8, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 8, 2019

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 8, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d6a6f6/3387/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2936360
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2935992
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.148 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.53 ): -0.039 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.53 ): -0.039 KiB MessageLogger/Errors
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 7.3 ): -0.035 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 7.3 ): -0.035 KiB MessageLogger/Errors
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Nov 8, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 8, 2019

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 8, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit d05031d into cms-sw:master Nov 8, 2019
@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 9, 2019

@perrotta @jeongeun after the integration there is a failure in wf 150

Copy link
Contributor

@perrotta perrotta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jeongeun , this should fix wf 150
Could you please prepare a fix PR with it, and test it with wf 150?

hiDetachedTripletStepQual)
hiDetachedTripletStep = cms.Sequence(hiDetachedTripletStepTask)
hiDetachedTripletStep_Phase1 = hiDetachedTripletStep.copy()
hiDetachedTripletStep_Phase1.replace(hiDetachedTripletStepTracksHitDoublets, hiDetachedTripletStepTracksHitDoubletsCA)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These have to be replaced in the Task now, not in the sequence

hiDetachedTripletStepQual)
hiDetachedTripletStep = cms.Sequence(hiDetachedTripletStepTask)
hiDetachedTripletStep_Phase1 = hiDetachedTripletStep.copy()
hiDetachedTripletStep_Phase1.replace(hiDetachedTripletStepTracksHitDoublets, hiDetachedTripletStepTracksHitDoubletsCA)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These have to be replaced in the Task now, not in the sequence

hiDetachedTripletStepQual)
hiDetachedTripletStep = cms.Sequence(hiDetachedTripletStepTask)
hiDetachedTripletStep_Phase1 = hiDetachedTripletStep.copy()
hiDetachedTripletStep_Phase1.replace(hiDetachedTripletStepTracksHitDoublets, hiDetachedTripletStepTracksHitDoubletsCA)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These have to be replaced in the Task now, not in the sequence

hiLowPtTripletStepQual
)
hiLowPtTripletStep = cms.Sequence(hiLowPtTripletStepTask)
hiLowPtTripletStep_Phase1 = hiLowPtTripletStep.copy()
hiLowPtTripletStep_Phase1.replace(hiLowPtTripletStepTracksHitDoublets, hiLowPtTripletStepTracksHitDoubletsCA)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These have to be replaced in the Task now, not in the sequence

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@jeongeun @fabiocos : just to speed up and avoid the needs of reverting this PR in case a pre-release wants to be cut, I submitted a fix PR with #28372

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants