Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

A much more lax approach to privelege separation #816

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024
Merged

A much more lax approach to privelege separation #816

merged 7 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

edigaryev
Copy link
Contributor

@edigaryev edigaryev commented Nov 26, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Compared to #814.

Closes #814.

@edigaryev edigaryev requested a review from fkorotkov November 26, 2024 15:19
@edigaryev edigaryev mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2024
Closed
fkorotkov
fkorotkov approved these changes Nov 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@fkorotkov fkorotkov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes! I was just looking into something similar myself. The other approach is clever, maybe even too clever for my taste.

@edigaryev edigaryev requested a review from fkorotkov November 26, 2024 16:49
@edigaryev edigaryev merged commit 51d0322 into master Nov 28, 2024
11 checks passed
@edigaryev edigaryev deleted the privsep-very-lax branch November 28, 2024 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@fkorotkov fkorotkov fkorotkov approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@edigaryev @fkorotkov