CIP0025 | retitle to Media NFT Metadata Standard

[Jack-0]

No description provided.

[rphair]

@SmaugPool this seems consistent with what you recently said here: #345 (comment)

My understanding is that retitling it would be consistent with discussion so far, in which more than one contributor used media support as a rationale for making the NFT images mandatory (because all media were presumed to be representable by an image).

So if @alessandrokonrad has no objections then I would approve this change.

I do need to retitle this for brevity and eliminate the question of whether this is being done for "clarity" (since the existing title isn't really unclear) or "precision", "accuracy", or "specificity" which were the words I would have used.

[rphair]

Approving this since no objections from author & because the more precise definition is consistent with documentation & usage.

[SmaugPool]

Yes, at some point the idea was to split the CIP in 2, one for the policy/asset structure that could be used for example for fungible tokens too, and one for the media specific metadata:

#85 (comment)

This did not happen so I guess it makes sense to rename the whole CIP instead.

[KtorZ]

Seems fine indeed, we also need to update the top-level README's table.

[rphair]

thanks @KtorZ ... have added that.