-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 339
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CIP-0028 | Alonzo Protocol Parameter Description #140
Conversation
1. Removed CIP preamble as requested by Sebastien 2. Added section on how to update the parameters in future, as requested by the committee.
Fixed table formatting in change paragraph.
Added back header
setting next available non-reserved number, moving status to 'Draft' (internal discussion happening)
CIP moved to proper dir
+1 |
Do you mean to nest it under CIP-0009? |
Your call as to whether to nest it or separate it, of course - just let me know. It depends on CIP-0009. I think the correct approach will be to document the changes from the previous version as we go forwards (i.e. the incremental changes). In case it's about the history, I have a technical problem in that I can only have one fork of the repo (GitHub limits to one fork per account), so I think the commits will always be shown as a chain. There's presumably some way to squash merge once the PR is accepted |
as previously discussed - moving this under CIP 28
Title: Protocol Parameters (Alonzo) | ||
Authors: Kevin Hammond <kevin.hammond@iohk.io> | ||
Status: Draft | ||
Type: Informational |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't this be a standard CIP, considering these are parameters that all node implementations should be aware of?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel the distinction to limit expectations: as understood this is meant as a "snapshot" CIP (and therefore might best sit as "Informational"). Current conversation around the changed block size since this PR was created is reflecting this.
This is an ongoing conversation really.
This CIP describes the new protocol parameters that have been implemented for Alonzo. It is an information CIP that builds on the initial parameter settings (CIP-0009).