Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 8, 2022. It is now read-only.

Using a build matrix to split coverage/e2e #299

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 16, 2017
Merged

Conversation

Blackbaud-BobbyEarl
Copy link

@Blackbaud-BobbyEarl Blackbaud-BobbyEarl commented Oct 12, 2017

This was a quick experiment in making the build slightly quicker. It moves the coverage and e2e steps into separate "environments." While not a huge impact, it does shave a couple minutes off the total "real" time needed.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 12, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #299 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #299   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          59     59           
  Lines        1368   1368           
  Branches      207    207           
=====================================
  Hits         1368   1368
Flag Coverage Δ
#builder 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#runtime 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#srcapp 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 39da305...af1b9d4. Read the comment docs.

@Blackbaud-SteveBrush Blackbaud-SteveBrush merged commit 4133071 into master Oct 16, 2017
@Blackbaud-SteveBrush Blackbaud-SteveBrush deleted the build-matrix branch October 16, 2017 19:50
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants