Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: add transformKeysToSnake #39

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: add transformKeysToSnake #39

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

jsertx
Copy link
Contributor

@jsertx jsertx commented Mar 3, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Description:

  • Add transformKeysToSnake

New features:

  • transformKeysToSnake

PR status:

  • Version bumped
  • Change-log updated
  • Tests added or updated
  • PR keeps 100% test coverage
  • Type definition updated
  • Readme updated
  • Linter is applied
  • Const arrow functions are used instead of pure function definitions where applicable
  • Functions are listed in alphabetic order in index.js, index.d.ts and readme

@jsertx jsertx marked this pull request as draft March 3, 2025 10:34
@jsertx jsertx changed the title feat: add transformKeysToSnake + isPlainObject fix feat: add transformKeysToSnake Mar 4, 2025
@jsertx jsertx marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2025 15:20
avsek477
avsek477 requested changes Mar 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
avsek477
avsek477 reviewed Mar 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@avsek477 avsek477 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rest, lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@batrudinych batrudinych batrudinych left review comments

@avsek477 avsek477 avsek477 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@jsertx @batrudinych @avsek477