Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update installation-guide.md #1420

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

Lalit159
Copy link

@Lalit159 Lalit159 commented Mar 16, 2025

Description

  • ...
  • ...
  • ...

Related issue(s)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the installation guide to clarify Node and NPM upgrade instructions for improved readability and ease of use.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 16, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: b5c4cb2

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This update refines a sentence in the installation guide documentation to clarify the upgrade instructions. The revised sentence now directly instructs users to upgrade NPM or Node if their version is below the recommended level, ensuring the guidance is straightforward.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/generator/.../installation-guide.md Revised wording in the upgrade instruction to clearly state when to update Node and NPM.

Suggested labels

ready-to-merge

Suggested reviewers

  • Florence-Njeri
  • asyncapi-bot-eve
  • derberg

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a code delight,
Hopping through docs with all my might,
Changing words to shine so bright,
Upgrades clear in every byte,
A happy hop—our guide is just right!
🐇✨

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

asyncapi-bot commented Mar 16, 2025

We require all PRs to follow Conventional Commits specification.
More details 👇🏼

 No release type found in pull request title "Update installation-guide.md". Add a prefix to indicate what kind of release this pull request corresponds to. For reference, see https://www.conventionalcommits.org/

Available types:
 - feat: A new feature
 - fix: A bug fix
 - docs: Documentation only changes
 - style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
 - refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
 - perf: A code change that improves performance
 - test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
 - build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
 - ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)
 - chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
 - revert: Reverts a previous commit

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/generator/docs/installation-guide.md (1)

25-26: Enhance Clarity for Upgrade Instructions

The updated sentence is clearer in instructing users to upgrade if their installed versions are below the recommended levels. However, the phrase “if your version is lower than the recommended one” can be slightly ambiguous since there are separate recommendations for Node.js and NPM. Consider rephrasing to explicitly mention both tools.

For example:

-If you have the correct versions installed, proceed to the CLI installation guide below. Otherwise, upgrade NPM or Node if your version is lower than the recommended one.
+If you have the correct versions installed, proceed to the CLI installation guide below. Otherwise, if either your Node.js or NPM version is below the recommended level, please upgrade them to continue.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 06a97bc and b5c4cb2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/generator/docs/installation-guide.md (1 hunks)

@ItshMoh
Copy link
Contributor

ItshMoh commented Mar 17, 2025

Hey @Lalit159 you should change the PR title. Always look for the workflow result whenever you make a PR or create an Issue.

@ItshMoh
Copy link
Contributor

ItshMoh commented Mar 17, 2025

@Lalit159 bot has commented for the supported titles

@Light13008
Copy link

@Lalit159
You need to add suitable PR descriptions,
and follow the Lint PR title guidelines for any PR you make,
Available types: 👇 👇

  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • docs: Documentation only changes
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
  • refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
  • ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)
  • chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
  • revert: Reverts a previous commit.

for this simple commit, you can change the title to:
docs(installation): improve wording and clarity in installation guide

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants