Narrow conditions for PEP 585 error

[jrmccluskey]

Makes the conditions for throwing the PEP 585 generics support TypeError more narrow to avoid false positives (e.g. only built-in types can trigger the error now)

Part of work on #23366

---

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

• Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
• Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
• If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #25084 (72c9468) into master (1c4e424) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 80.00%.

❗ Current head 72c9468 differs from pull request most recent head 29b5d45. Consider uploading reports for the commit 29b5d45 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #25084      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.12%   73.12%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         735      735              
  Lines       98153    98157       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        71776    71778       +2     
- Misses      25013    25015       +2     
  Partials     1364     1364              

Flag	Coverage Δ
python	82.67% <80.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
sdks/python/apache_beam/typehints/typehints.py	92.74% <80.00%> (-0.14%)	⬇️
.../python/apache_beam/testing/test_stream_service.py	88.09% <0.00%> (-4.77%)	⬇️
...che_beam/runners/interactive/interactive_runner.py	90.50% <0.00%> (-1.27%)	⬇️
sdks/python/apache_beam/transforms/util.py	96.24% <0.00%> (-0.16%)	⬇️
...hon/apache_beam/runners/worker/bundle_processor.py	93.54% <0.00%> (ø)
...on/apache_beam/runners/dataflow/dataflow_runner.py	81.88% <0.00%> (+0.14%)	⬆️
sdks/python/apache_beam/runners/direct/executor.py	97.01% <0.00%> (+0.54%)	⬆️
sdks/python/apache_beam/utils/interactive_utils.py	97.56% <0.00%> (+2.43%)	⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[github-actions]

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @damccorm for label python.

Available commands:

• stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
• remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
• waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

[damccorm]

Actually, could you add a test that doesn't throw with a non-builtin generic?

[damccorm]

Thanks!

[jrmccluskey]

Something didn't work syncing to master, just going to close this PR and open a new one