Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure stable secondary ordering #43085

Merged

Conversation

pierrejeambrun
Copy link
Member

The secondary default ordering is just to be sure that in case of equality on the primary ordering criteria objects follow a stable ordering. This is not the case by default and I added that because I obversed some flakyness on some tests due to that.

Was removed in #42782 by mistake. (secondary ordering is the same as the first one)

@pierrejeambrun pierrejeambrun added the AIP-84 Modern Rest API label Oct 16, 2024
@pierrejeambrun pierrejeambrun self-assigned this Oct 16, 2024
@pierrejeambrun
Copy link
Member Author

cc: @bugraoz93

@bugraoz93
Copy link
Collaborator

bugraoz93 commented Oct 16, 2024

@pierrejeambrun This was the method I mentioned as unused. Thanks for including the removal and the fix!
It looks great!

@bugraoz93
Copy link
Collaborator

I believe the fix for the failing check has already been merged in here #43087

@pierrejeambrun pierrejeambrun merged commit ec37818 into apache:main Oct 17, 2024
51 checks passed
@pierrejeambrun pierrejeambrun deleted the enforce-stable-order-secondary-ordering branch October 17, 2024 10:40
R7L208 pushed a commit to R7L208/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
harjeevanmaan pushed a commit to harjeevanmaan/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
PaulKobow7536 pushed a commit to PaulKobow7536/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AIP-84 Modern Rest API
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants