Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude backfill dag runs in active_runs_of_dags counts #42684

Conversation

dstandish
Copy link
Contributor

In the areas where this is used, we don't want to include backfill runs in the counts. Rather than rename the function to reflect the change, I add a parameter.

(cherry picked from commit 5cbc941)

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler label Oct 2, 2024
@dstandish dstandish force-pushed the aip-78-optionally-ignore-backfill-in-active_runs_of_dags-counts branch from de572ff to d499f90 Compare October 7, 2024 14:12
@dstandish dstandish force-pushed the aip-78-optionally-ignore-backfill-in-active_runs_of_dags-counts branch 2 times, most recently from 8a3f295 to 4c82525 Compare October 16, 2024 14:06
@dstandish dstandish changed the title Optionally ignore backfill in active_runs_of_dags counts Exclude backfill dag runs in active_runs_of_dags counts Oct 16, 2024
In the areas where this is used, we don't want to include backfill runs in the counts.
Rather than rename the function to reflect the change, I add a parameter.
@dstandish dstandish force-pushed the aip-78-optionally-ignore-backfill-in-active_runs_of_dags-counts branch from 4c82525 to 9bddbd6 Compare October 16, 2024 22:05
@dstandish dstandish marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2024 22:07
@dstandish dstandish force-pushed the aip-78-optionally-ignore-backfill-in-active_runs_of_dags-counts branch from a2eaaa3 to 49c12a6 Compare October 17, 2024 14:30
@kaxil kaxil merged commit c7b9c8d into apache:main Oct 17, 2024
100 checks passed
@kaxil kaxil deleted the aip-78-optionally-ignore-backfill-in-active_runs_of_dags-counts branch October 17, 2024 20:23
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
 Ignore "depends_on_past" for first run in a backfill

This implements this pre-AIP-78 behavior in AIP-78 backfill logic.

Depends on #42684
harjeevanmaan pushed a commit to harjeevanmaan/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
In the areas where this is used, we don't want to include backfill runs in the counts. Rather than rename the function to reflect the change, I add a parameter.

https://github.com/orgs/apache/projects/408
harjeevanmaan pushed a commit to harjeevanmaan/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
 Ignore "depends_on_past" for first run in a backfill

This implements this pre-AIP-78 behavior in AIP-78 backfill logic.

Depends on apache#42684
PaulKobow7536 pushed a commit to PaulKobow7536/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
In the areas where this is used, we don't want to include backfill runs in the counts. Rather than rename the function to reflect the change, I add a parameter.

https://github.com/orgs/apache/projects/408
PaulKobow7536 pushed a commit to PaulKobow7536/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
 Ignore "depends_on_past" for first run in a backfill

This implements this pre-AIP-78 behavior in AIP-78 backfill logic.

Depends on apache#42684
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
In the areas where this is used, we don't want to include backfill runs in the counts. Rather than rename the function to reflect the change, I add a parameter.

https://github.com/orgs/apache/projects/408
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
 Ignore "depends_on_past" for first run in a backfill

This implements this pre-AIP-78 behavior in AIP-78 backfill logic.

Depends on apache#42684
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants