forked from solana-labs/solana
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 380
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove vec allocation in CRDS deserialize #5143
Open
alexpyattaev
wants to merge
2
commits into
anza-xyz:master
Choose a base branch
from
alexpyattaev:gossip_crds_value_deserialize_alloc
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+17
−3
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we should do this as we haven't actually initialized the buffer. We currently do something like this elsewhere in the codebase, but we shouldn't do it there either and PR's that have addressed that behavior have gotten hung up in review.
I think there are two approaches we can consider here:
[0u8; PACKET_DATA_SIZE]
like you previously had ORassume_init()
in one of the other places that we doNot having to zero the buffer should seemingly have some gains. But, I think removing the alloc is the more significant gain so maybe it makes sense to keep this PR simpler for now
CC @alessandrod
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@steviez I do not see a reason to zero-out this buffer. We are never actually reading any values from it for anything other than hashing. I agree the actual overhead is probably very small, but we are doing this up to 20K times per second. @alessandrod was the one who suggested that initializing it is not useful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't want to speak for Alessandro, but here is a comment from him on a very similar item on that same PR I linked: #3533 (comment)
If I understand correctly, I think his suggestion is something like:
MaybeUninit<[u8; PACKET_DATA_SIZE]>
like you have it nowMaybeUninit
is written to with pointers, you can't directly callbincode::serialize_into()
(unless I missed something) which is why I wrote that thin wrapper in my code.assume_init()
to mark that we have now fully initialized the buffer